Repetition Rate of Scanning Due to Motion Artefacts in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: a Retrospective Study
- PMID: 38812948
- PMCID: PMC11131378
- DOI: 10.5037/jomr.2024.15106
Repetition Rate of Scanning Due to Motion Artefacts in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: a Retrospective Study
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this retrospective study was to investigate the incidence of repeated cone-beam computed tomography scans due to motion artefacts in a Turkish subpopulation.
Material and methods: A total of 6364 patients' cone-beam computed tomography data were analysed retrospectively to identify repeated scans due to motion artefacts. Patients were divided into eight age groups: 1) < 10-year-olds, 2) 10 to 19-year-olds, 3) 20 to 29-year-olds, 4) 30 to 39-year-olds, 5) 40 to 49-year-olds, 6) 50 to 59-year-olds, 7) 60 to 69-year-olds, and 8) > 70 year-olds. Chi-square test was applied to evaluate the repetition rate of scans by age and gender groups. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
Results: Repeated scans due to motion artefacts were observed in 1.96% of the patients. The repetition rate of scans was significantly higher in males than in females (P = 0.006). Furthermore, the repetition rate of scans was significantly higher in patients < 10 years old compared to the other age groups. However, there was no significant difference in the repetition rate of scans due to motion artefacts among the other age groups (P > 0.05).
Conclusions: The present findings suggest that patient age and gender are associated with repeated cone-beam computed tomography scans due to motion artefacts. Males and children under the age of 10 had more common repeated scans due to motion artefacts.
Keywords: artifact; cone-beam computed tomography; movement; patient.
Copyright © Kalabalık F, Aytuğar E, Aykanat F, Çiftçi C. Published in the JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH (http://www.ejomr.org), 31 March 2024.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest related to this study. Also, this research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effect of patient anxiety on image motion artefacts in CBCT.BMC Oral Health. 2017 Apr 4;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0367-4. BMC Oral Health. 2017. PMID: 28376773 Free PMC article.
-
Objective assessment of the combined effect of exomass-related- and motion artefacts in cone beam CT.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021 Jan 1;50(1):20200255. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20200255. Epub 2020 Aug 19. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021. PMID: 32706986 Free PMC article.
-
Repetition of Examination Due to Motion Artifacts in Horizontal Cone Beam CT: Comparison among Three Different Kinds of Head Support.J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017 Jul-Aug;7(4):208-213. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_17_17. Epub 2017 Jul 31. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017. PMID: 28852638 Free PMC article.
-
A retrospective, semi-quantitative image quality analysis of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and MSCT in the diagnosis of distal radius fractures.Eur Radiol. 2016 Dec;26(12):4551-4561. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4321-7. Epub 2016 Mar 22. Eur Radiol. 2016. PMID: 27003138
-
The adaptation and investigation of cone-beam CT reconstruction algorithms for horizontal rotation fixed-gantry scans of rabbits.Phys Med Biol. 2021 May 14;66(10). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/abf9dd. Phys Med Biol. 2021. PMID: 33878747
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources