Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 14:5:1377133.
doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1377133. eCollection 2024.

Well-designed manufacturing work improves some cognitive abilities in individuals with cognitive impairments

Affiliations

Well-designed manufacturing work improves some cognitive abilities in individuals with cognitive impairments

Pamela Banta Lavenex et al. Front Rehabil Sci. .

Abstract

Introduction: Employment is recognized as a fundamental human right, which correlates with better physical and mental health. Importantly, well-designed work, which considers the physical, social, and psychological impacts of work, can serve to enhance the cognitive abilities of workers. Although often overlooked, work for individuals with disabilities, including cognitive impairments, is equally important for their physical and mental well-being. What has not been established, however, is whether well-designed work can also enhance the cognitive abilities of individuals with cognitive impairments.

Methods: Using a longitudinal study design, we investigated the impact of well-designed work on the cognitive abilities of 60 participants (operators) at the AMIPI Foundation factories, which employ individuals with cognitive impairments to produce electrical cables and harnesses for the automobile industry. The same operators were assessed at three different time points: upon hiring (n = 60), and after working in the factory for 1 year (n = 41, since 19 left the factory) and 2 years (n = 28, since 13 more left the factory). We used five cognitive tests evaluating: (1) finger and manual dexterity, bimanual dexterity, and procedural memory using the Purdue Pegboard; (2) sustained and selective attention using the Symbol Cancellation Task; (3) short- and long-term declarative verbal memory and long-term verbal recognition memory using Rey's Audio-Verbal Learning Test; (4) short- and long-term visual recognition memory using the Continuous Visual Memory Test; and (5) abstract reasoning using Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices.

Results: We observed improvements in procedural memory, sustained and selective attention, and short- and long-term visual recognition memory after working in the factory for 1 or 2 years. We did not observe improvements in finger or manual dexterity or bimanual dexterity, nor short- or long-term declarative verbal memory or verbal recognition memory, nor abstract reasoning.

Discussion: We conclude that, in addition to improving physical and mental well-being, well-designed manufacturing work can serve as a training intervention improving some types of cognitive functioning in individuals with cognitive impairments.

Keywords: cognitive enhancement; cognitive training; fluid intelligence; intellectual disability; well-designed work.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

MB and CG were employees at the AMIPI Foundation for the duration of this study. PBL was remunerated by the AMIPI Foundation to conduct this study. The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustration of four tasks used in the current study. (A) Symbol Cancellation Task. (B) Purdue Pegboard. (C) Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices (RSPM). (D) Continuous Visual Memory task (CVMT). NB: Rey's Auditory Verbal Learning task (RAVLT) is not shown (see Table 1 for Structure and Supplementary Tables S2–S4 for word lists). (E) Schema of the testing procedure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Participants in the study at Time 1 (T1), Time 2 (T2) and Time 3 (T3). Sixty operators were tested at T1. After T1, 19 operators left the AMIPI Foundation and thus were no longer eligible to continue in the study. The remaining forty-one operators were tested again at T2 (referred to as Group 2&3). After T2, 13 more operators left the AMIPI Foundation. The remaining twenty-eight operators were tested again at T3 (referred to as Group 3).

Similar articles

References

    1. Blank AA, Harries P, Reynolds F. “Without occupation you don't exist”: occupational engagement and mental illness. J Occup Sci. (2015) 22(2):197–209. 10.1080/14427591.2014.882250 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). Available online at: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights (Accessed September 3, 2023).
    1. Álvaro JL, Garrido A, Pereira CR, Torres AR, Barros SC. Unemployment, self-esteem, and depression: differences between men and women. Span J Psychol. (2019) 22:E1. 10.1017/sjp.2018.68 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Friedland DS, Price RH. Underemployment: consequences for the health and well-being of workers. Am J Community Psychol. (2003) 32:33–45. 10.1023/A:1025638705649 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hergenrather KC, Zeglin RJ, McGuire-Kuletz M, Rhodes SD. Employment as a social determinant of health: a systematic review of longitudinal studies exploring the relationship between employment status and physical health. Rehab Res Policy Educ. (2015) 29(1):2–26. 10.1891/2168-6653.29.1.2 - DOI