Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Mar 27:71:102560.
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102560. eCollection 2024 May.

Diabetic and hypertensive disorders following early pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Jennifer Dunne  1   2 , Damien Foo  1   3 , Berihun A Dachew  1 , Bereket Duko  1   4 , Amanuel T Gebremedhin  1   5 , Sylvester D Nyadanu  1 , Gavin Pereira  1   2 , Gizachew A Tessema  1   2   6
Affiliations
Review

Diabetic and hypertensive disorders following early pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Jennifer Dunne et al. EClinicalMedicine. .

Abstract

Background: Spontaneous and induced abortions are common outcomes of pregnancy. There is inconsistent evidence of an association between early pregnancy loss and subsequent diabetic and hypertensive disorders in women. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated evidence on the risk of the subsequent development of pregnancy and non-pregnancy related diabetic and hypertensive disorders in women who experienced an early pregnancy loss.

Methods: Systematic searches were conducted in seven electronic databases (CINAHL Plus, Ovid/EMBASE, Ovid/MEDLINE, ProQuest, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) from inception to 22nd December 2023. Studies were included if they reported an exposure of spontaneous abortion (SAB), induced abortion (IA) or recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) with an outcome of gestational diabetes mellitus, pre-eclampsia, gestational hypertension, and non-pregnancy related diabetic and hypertensive disorders. Risk of bias was assessed using Risk of Bias Instrument for Non-Randomized Studies of Exposures (ROBINS-E). Random effects meta-analysis was used to pool odds of developing diabetic and hypertensive disorders following an early pregnancy loss. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022327689).

Findings: Of 20,176 records, 60 unique articles were identified for full-text review and 52 met the inclusion criteria, representing a total population of 4,132,895 women from 22 countries. Thirty-five studies were suitable for meta-analysis, resulting in a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 1.44 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-1.68) for gestational diabetes mellitus following a prior SAB and a pooled OR of 1.06 (95% CI 0.90-1.26) for pre-eclampsia following a prior SAB. RPL increased the odds of developing pre-eclampsia (OR 1.37 95% CI 1.05-1.79). There was no association between IA and diabetic and hypertensive disorders.

Interpretation: A prior SAB was associated with increased odds of gestational diabetes mellitus, but not pre-eclampsia. However, women who experienced RPL had an increased risk of subsequent pre-eclampsia. Future research is required to establish evidence for an association between early pregnancy loss with non-pregnancy related diabetic and hypertensive disorders.

Funding: National Health and Medical Research Council.

Keywords: Abortion; Diabetes; Hypertension; Miscarriage; Pre-eclampsia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Systematic review of the literature examining the association between early pregnancy loss and pregnancy and non-pregnancy diabetic and hypertensive disorders.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Exposure (ROBINS-E) summary. OR: Odds ratio. CI: Confidence interval, p: p-value.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Meta-analysis of the association between a prior spontaneous abortion and the risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus in a subsequent pregnancy. OR: Odds ratio. CI: Confidence interval, p: p-value.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Meta-analysis of the association between a prior spontaneous abortion and the risk of developing pre-eclampsia in a subsequent pregnancy.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sedgh G.D., Bearak J.P., Singh S.P., et al. Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: global, regional, and subregional levels and trends. Lancet. 2016;388(10041):258–267. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30380-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mohangoo A.D., Blondel B., Gissler M., et al. International comparisons of fetal and neonatal mortality rates in high-income countries: should exclusion thresholds be based on birth weight or gestational age? PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e64869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064869. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Christou A., Dibley M.J., Raynes-Greenow C. Beyond counting stillbirths to understanding their determinants in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic assessment of stillbirth data availability in household surveys. Trop Med Int Health. 2017;22(3):294–311. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12828. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dimitriadis E., Menkhorst E., Saito S., Kutteh W.H., Brosens J.J. Recurrent pregnancy loss. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2020;6(1):98. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-00228-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bearak J., Popinchalk A., Ganatra B., et al. Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990–2019. Lancet Global Health. 2020;8(9):e1152–e1161. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30315-6. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources