Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 25;53(6):1817-1824.
doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5752. eCollection 2023.

What is the impact of intraperitoneal surfactant administration against postoperative intraabdominal adhesion formation? an experimental study

Affiliations

What is the impact of intraperitoneal surfactant administration against postoperative intraabdominal adhesion formation? an experimental study

Şehmus Pala et al. Turk J Med Sci. .

Abstract

Background/aim: Surfactant is a surface-active substance that, in addition to its detergent effect, also has effects that reduce inflammation and fibrosis. Because of these effects, it was aimed herein to investigate the effect of intraperitoneal surfactant application on preventing postoperative peritoneal adhesion formation in a uterine horn adhesion model.

Materials and methods: Twenty-one Wistar albino rats were randomly divided into 3 groups (G1-G3), as follows: G1 (n = 7): control group. The abdomen was opened and then closed; G2 (n = 7): adhesion group. The abdomen was opened. Then, a 2-cm linear incision was made over the right uterine horn, 2 mL of isotonic saline was administered intraperitoneally, and the abdomen was closed; and G3 (n = 7): treatment group. The abdomen was opened, a 2-cm linear incision was made over the right uterine horn, 2 mL (70 mg/kg) of surfactant was administered intraperitoneally, and the abdomen was closed. After 15 days, the rats were euthanized, the abdomens were reopened, and adhesion scoring was performed. After the right uterine horns were removed and fixed with 10% formalin, appropriate sections were taken from the traumatized tissue, stained with Masson's trichrome, and fibrosis and inflammation scoring were performed.

Results: The adhesion area and intensity were significantly higher in G2 than in G1 and G3 (p = 0.001) and were similar in G1 and G3 (p = 0.165). While fibrosis and inflammation were significantly higher in G2 than in G1 and G3 (p = 0.001), there was no difference between G1 and G3 (p = 0.5).

Conclusion: Intraperitoneal surfactant administration at a dose of 70 mg/kg was found to be effective in preventing intraabdominal adhesion formation in a rat uterine horn model.

Keywords: Postoperative adhesion; experimental model; rat; surfactant; uterine horn.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intraabdominal macroscopic images from all 3 groups. A) Image of the incision made to form adhesion to the uterine horn. B) Image from G1. Film adhesions are observed between the abdominal wall and the intraabdominal organs. C) Image from G2. Wide-surfaced, dense adhesions are observed in the uterine horn, including the surrounding tissue and the intestinal loop. D) Image from G3. Film adhesion is observed between the uterine horn and the surrounding tissue.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Histopathological images from all 3 groups (H&E and Masson’s trichrome staining): a–b) G1, c–d) G2, and e–f) G3. When G1 and G2 are compared, a significant increase in congestion (black arrow), edema (black star), epithelial separation and deterioration (red arrow) and fibrosis (red star) are observed in G2 compared to G1. Compared with G2, a significant reduction in the aforementioned histopathological findings can be seen in G3.

Similar articles

References

    1. Makarchian HR, Kasraianfard A, Ghaderzadeh P, Javadi SM, Ghorbanpoor M. The effectiveness of heparin, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and silver nanoparticles on prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesion formation in rats. Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira. 2017;32(1):22–27. doi: 10.1590/s0102-865020170103. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ten Broek RPG, Stommel MWJ, Strik C, van Laarhoven CJHM, Keus F, et al. Benefits and harms of adhesion barriers for abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2014;383(9911):48–59. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61687-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kataria H, Singh VP. Liquid paraffin vs. hyaluronic acid in preventing intraperitoneal adhesions. The Indian Journal of Surgery. 2017;79(6):539–543. doi: 10.1007/s12262-016-1522-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brochhausen C, Schmitt VH, Planck CN, Rajab TK, Hollemann D, et al. Current strategies and future perspectives for intraperitoneal adhesion prevention. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2012;16(6):1256–1274. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1819-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sahbaz A, Aynioglu O, Isik H, Gun BD, Cengil O, et al. Pycnogenol prevents peritoneal adhesions. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2015;292(6):1279–1284. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3764-4. - DOI - PubMed

Substances