Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 15:15:1393836.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1393836. eCollection 2024.

Who spoke that language? Assessing early face-language associations in monolingual and bilingual infants

Affiliations

Who spoke that language? Assessing early face-language associations in monolingual and bilingual infants

Laia Marcet et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Introduction: In bilingual communities, knowing the language each speaker uses may support language separation and, later, guide language use in a context-appropriate manner. Previous research has shown that infants begin to form primary associations between the face and the language used by a speaker around the age of 3 months. However, there is still a limited understanding of how robust these associations are and whether they are influenced by the linguistic background of the infant. To answer these questions, this study explores monolingual and bilingual infants' ability to form face-language associations throughout the first year of life.

Methods: A group of 4-, 6-, and 10-month-old Spanish and/or Catalan monolingual and bilingual infants were tested in an eye-tracking preferential-looking paradigm (N = 156). After the infants were familiarized with videos of a Catalan and a Spanish speaker, they were tested in two types of test trials with different task demands. First, a Silent test trial assessed primary face-language associations by measuring infants' visual preference for the speakers based on the language they had previously used. Then, two Language test trials assessed more robust face-language associations by measuring infants' ability to match the face of each speaker with their corresponding language.

Results: When measuring primary face-language associations, both monolingual and bilingual infants exhibited language-based preferences according to their specific exposure to the languages. Interestingly, this preference varied with age, with a transition from an initial familiarity preference to a novelty preference in older infants. Four-month-old infants showed a preference for the speaker who used their native/dominant language, while 10-month-old infants preferred the speaker who used their non-native/non-dominant language. When measuring more robust face-language associations, infants did not demonstrate signs of consistently matching the faces of the speakers with the language they had previously used, regardless of age or linguistic background.

Discussion: Overall, the results indicate that while both monolingual and bilingual infants before the first year of life can form primary face-language associations, these associations remain fragile as infants seemed unable to maintain them when tested in a more demanding task.

Keywords: face-language associations; infant bilingualism; native language preference; preferential looking; speaker perception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the three phases in the experimental task: Familiarization, Silent test trial, and Language test trials.
Figure 2
Figure 2
PTLT to the native/dominant and non-native/non-dominant speaker in the first half of the Silent test trial, in 4-, 6-, and 10-month-old infants. Dots represent individual PTLT values, and error bars the standard error (SE) of the group mean.
Figure 3
Figure 3
PTLT to the native/dominant and non-native/non-dominant speaker in the first half of the Silent test trial, in 4-, 6-, and 10-month-old monolingual and bilingual infants. Dots represent individual PTLT values, and error bars the standard error (SE) of the group mean.
Figure 4
Figure 4
PTLT to the match and mismatch speaker in the Language test trials combined, in 4-, 6-, and 10-month-old monolingual and bilingual infants. Dots represent individual PTLT values, and error bars the standard error (SE) of the group mean.

References

    1. Bahrick L. E., Hernandez-Reif M., Flom R. (2005). The development of infant learning about specific face-voice relations. Dev. Psychol. 41, 541–552. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.3.541, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barrera M. E., Maurer D. (1981). Discrimination of strangers by the three-month-old. Child Dev. 52:558. doi: 10.2307/1129174 - DOI
    1. Birulés J., Bosch L., Brieke R., Pons F., Lewkowicz D. J. (2019). Inside bilingualism: language background modulates selective attention to a talker’s mouth. Dev. Sci. 22:e12755. doi: 10.1111/DESC.12755, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Birulés J., Goupil L., Josse J., Fort M. (2023). The role of talking faces in infant language learning: mind the gap between screen-based settings and real-life communicative interactions. Brain Sci. 13:1167. doi: 10.3390/BRAINSCI13081167 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bosch L., Sebastián-Gallés N. (1997). Native-language recognition abilities in 4-month-old infants from monolingual and bilingual environments. Cognition 65, 33–69. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00040-1, PMID: - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources