A novel global safe surgery mentorship program using a multidisciplinary team approach
- PMID: 38813996
- DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12216
A novel global safe surgery mentorship program using a multidisciplinary team approach
Abstract
Background: The global surgery movement aims to provide equitable surgical care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and attempts to address a wide range of issues around the lack of access and poor-quality. In response, the Lifebox McCaskey Safe Surgery Fellowship was established in Ethiopia to train a multidisciplinary team of healthcare professionals. We conducted this study to evaluate the outcome of this training program.
Methods: A qualitative study was conducted to evaluate the implementations and outcomes of the first three cohorts of the McCaskey Fellowship. Interviews with fellows, mentors, and program staff reveal valuable insights into the program's strengths and challenges.
Results: Key findings include positive feedback on the program's curriculum highlighting its multidisciplinary nature. Challenges were noted in maintaining schedules, communication with healthcare facilities, and budget constraints, suggesting the need for improved program management. The fellowship's impact was evident in altering participants' perceptions of teamwork and enhancing their research and leadership skills. Fellows initiated quality improvement projects impacting surgical practices positively. However, challenges, such as hospital resistance and the COVID-19 pandemic, affected program implementation.
Conclusion: Despite various challenges, the program's unique approach combining multidisciplinary training and local mentorship proves promising. It fosters a culture of teamwork, equips participants with essential skills, and encourages fellows to become advocates for safe surgery. As surgical quality champions emerge from this fellowship, there is optimism for lasting positive impacts on surgical care in LMICs.
Keywords: global surgery; patient safety; rural; training.
© 2024 International Society of Surgery/Société Internationale de Chirurgie (ISS/SIC).
References
REFERENCES
-
- Lozano, Rafael, Mohsen Naghavi, Kyle Foreman, Stephen Lim, Kenji Shibuya, Victor Aboyans, Jerry Abraham, et al. 2012. “Global and Regional Mortality from 235 Causes of Death for 20 Age Groups in 1990 and 2010: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.” The Lancet 380(9859): 2095–2128. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140‐6736(12)61728‐0.
-
- Lim, Stephen S., Theo Vos, Abraham D. Flaxman, Goodarz Danaei, Kenji Shibuya, Heather Adair‐Rohani, Mohammad A. AlMazroa, et al. 2012. “A Comparative Risk Assessment of Burden of Disease and Injury Attributable to 67 Risk Factors and Risk Factor Clusters in 21 Regions, 1990–2010: a Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.” The Lancet 380(9859): 2224–2260. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140‐6736(12)61766‐8.
-
- Shrime, Mark G., Ambereen Sleemi, and Thulasiraj D. Ravilla. 2015. “Charitable Platforms in Global Surgery: A Systematic Review of Their Effectiveness, Cost‐Effectiveness, Sustainability, and Role Training.” World Journal of Surgery 39(1): 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268‐014‐2516‐0.
-
- Abraham, Peter J., Mackenzie N. Abraham, Britney L. Corey, Brenessa Lindeman, and Herbert Chen. 2020. “Cross‐Sectional Analysis of Global Surgery Opportunities Among General Surgery Residency Programs.” Journal of Surgical Education 77(5): 1179–1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.03.017.
-
- Shrime, Mark G., Stephen W. Bickler, Blake C. Alkire, and Charlie Mock. 2015. “Global Burden of Surgical Disease: an Estimation from the Provider Perspective.” Lancet Global Health 3: S8–S9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214‐109x(14)70384‐5.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
