Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 30:13:RP94315.
doi: 10.7554/eLife.94315.

Neurexins control the strength and precise timing of glycinergic inhibition in the auditory brainstem

Affiliations

Neurexins control the strength and precise timing of glycinergic inhibition in the auditory brainstem

He-Hai Jiang et al. Elife. .

Abstract

Neurexins play diverse functions as presynaptic organizers in various glutamatergic and GABAergic synapses. However, it remains unknown whether and how neurexins are involved in shaping functional properties of the glycinergic synapses, which mediate prominent inhibition in the brainstem and spinal cord. To address these issues, we examined the role of neurexins in a model glycinergic synapse between the principal neuron in the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body (MNTB) and the principal neuron in the lateral superior olive (LSO) in the auditory brainstem. Combining RNAscope with stereotactic injection of AAV-Cre in the MNTB of neurexin1/2/3 conditional triple knockout mice, we showed that MNTB neurons highly express all isoforms of neurexins although their expression levels vary remarkably. Selective ablation of all neurexins in MNTB neurons not only reduced the amplitude but also altered the kinetics of the glycinergic synaptic transmission at LSO neurons. The synaptic dysfunctions primarily resulted from an impaired Ca2+ sensitivity of release and a loosened coupling between voltage-gated Ca2+ channels and synaptic vesicles. Together, our current findings demonstrate that neurexins are essential in controlling the strength and temporal precision of the glycinergic synapse, which therefore corroborates the role of neurexins as key presynaptic organizers in all major types of fast chemical synapses.

Keywords: LSO; MNTB; auditory; glycinergic; mouse; neurexins; neuroscience; synapse.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

HJ, RX, XN, ZS, XX, RP, YZ, FL No competing interests declared

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Neurexins are highly expressed in medial nucleus of the trapezoid body (MNTB) neurons.
(a) Immunohistochemistry and RNAscope fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) showing expression of various isoforms of neurexins in the MNTB, which make glycinergic synapses with lateral superior olive (LSO) neurons. (b) Summary of expression of various isoforms of neurexins in the MNTB of wild-type (WT) mice. Nrxn1 (n = 29), Nrxn2 (n = 29), p = 0.0001; Nrxn1 (n = 29), Nrxn3 (n = 24), p = 0.0001; Nrxn2 (n = 29), Nrxn3 (n = 24), p = 0.0001. (c) Diagram of auditory brainstem and virus injection in Nrxn123 cTKO mice. (d) Representative images of Nrxn3 FISH in the MNTB of mice injected with AAV-EGFP or AAV-Cre-EGFP. Scale bar: 50 μm. (e) Selected ROI(region of interest) in high magnification showing Nrxn3 FISH in MNTB neurons expressing EGFP or Cre-EGFP. Scale bar: 10 μm. (f) Summary of expression of various neurexins in the MNTB of Nrxn123 cTKO mice injected with AAV-EGFP and AAV-Cre-EGFP. Nrxn1: EGFP (n = 9), Cre (n = 19), p = 0.0053; Nrxn2: EGFP (n = 8), Cre (n = 14), p = 0.0038; Nrxn3: EGFP (n = 9), Cre (n = 14), p = 0.0016. Data are means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Number of sections analyzed are indicated in the bars (b, f); statistical differences were assessed by Student’s t-test (**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Deletion of neurexins reduces the strength and kinetics of glycinergic synapse.
(a) Representative inhibitory postsynaptic current (IPSC) traces of lateral superior olive (LSO) neurons evoked by optogenetic stimulation of ChR2 expressed in medial nucleus of the trapezoid body (MNTB) neurons. (b–d) Summary of IPSC amplitude, rise time, and decay time constant. Ctrl (n = 15), TKO (n = 11), p = 0.0119, p = 0.0004, p = 0.002. Unpaired two-sided t-test. (e–h) Same as a–d, except that IPSCs were evoked by afferent fiber stimulation. Ctrl (n = 15), TKO (n = 16), p = 0.0267, p = 0.152, p = 0.241. (i) Representative IPSCs traces of LSO neurons evoked by a pair of fiber stimulation at 50-ms interval. (j) Summary of paired-pulse ratio (PPR) of IPSCs in relationship to different paired-pulse intervals. Ctrl (n = 12), TKO (n = 12), p < 0.0001, two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Data are means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Number of neurons are indicated in the bars (b–d, f–h) or graph (j). Statistical differences were assessed by Student’s t-test or two-way ANOVA test (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).
Figure 2—figure supplement 1.
Figure 2—figure supplement 1.. The medial nucleus of the trapezoid body (MNTB)–lateral superior olive (LSO) synapse is predominantly glycinergic in mice.
(a) Representative sIPSC(spontaneous IPSC) traces of LSO neurons before and after application of potent glycine receptor blocker strychine (stry) (left) and summary of sIPSC amplitude without and with stry (right). (b) Representative eIPSC(evoked IPSC) traces of LSO neurons before and after stry application (left) and summary of eIPSC amplitude without and with stry (right). (c) Representative action potential (AP) firing of MNTB neurons infected with ChR2 during high-frequency repetitive pulse stimulation of 473 nm. (d) Representative oIPSC(optogenetically-evoked IPSC) traces of LSO neurons before and after stry application (left) and summary of oIPSC amplitude without and with stry (right). Statistical differences were assessed by Student’s t-test (**p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 2—figure supplement 2.
Figure 2—figure supplement 2.. Deletion of neurexins increases the paired-pulse ratio (PPR) of optogenetic-evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) at the glycinergic synapse.
Representative IPSC traces of lateral superior olive (LSO) neurons evoked by paired-pulse (20 Hz) optogenetic stimulation of ChR2 expressed in medial nucleus of the trapezoid body (MNTB) neurons in control (a) and Nrxn TKO (b) mice. Top, individual trials. Bottom, averaged trace of IPSC. (c) Summary of PPR of IPSC amplitude. Statistical differences were assessed by Student’s t-test (*p < 0.05).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Deletion of neurexins increases sIPSC frequency and glycinergic synapse density of lateral superior olive (LSO) neurons.
(a) Representative sIPSC traces of LSO neurons. (b) Summary of sIPSC amplitude and frequency. Ctrl (n = 14), TKO (n = 9), p = 0.057, p = 0.015, unpaired two-sided t-test. (c) Representative sIPSC waveforms of LSO neurons. (d) Summary of sIPSC rise time and decay time constant. Ctrl (n = 14), TKO (n = 9), p = 0.376, p = 0.82, unpaired two-sided t-test. (e) Representative confocal microscopy images of medial nucleus of the trapezoid body (MNTB)–LSO-containing brainstem slice with specific labeling of GlyT2 (red) and EGFP (green) from both control and Nrxn123 TKO mice at P14. Scale bar, 10 µm. (f) Summary of glycinergic synaptic density quantified by GlyT2 immunostaining. Ctrl (n = 42), TKO (n = 42), p = 0.0001, unpaired two-sided t-test. (g, h) Same as (e, f) except for specific labeling of VGAT (red) and EGFP (green). Ctrl (n = 42), TKO (n = 42), p = 0.0047, unpaired two-sided t-test. Data are means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Number of neurons or sections/animals for immunostaining are indicated in the bars (b, d, f, h). Statistical differences were assessed by Student’s t-test (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Deletion of neurexins increases the Ca2+ sensitivity of release at the glycinergic synapse.
(a) Representative time courses of inhibitory postsynaptic current (IPSC) amplitudes for individual lateral superior olive (LSO) neurons of control mice during the perfusion of low Ca2+ ACSF. (b) Representative IPSC traces of control mice before and during low Ca2+ perfusion at the indicated points in a. (c, d) Same as (a, b), except of TKO mice. (e) Summary of normalized IPSC amplitudes plotted against the calculated extracellular Ca2+ concentration for control and TKO mice. Ctrl (n = 7), TKO (n = 9), p = 0.0311 for 0.92 mM Ca2+, p = 0.0104 for 1.10 mM Ca2+, p = 0.0208 for 1.28 mM Ca2+, p = 0.0067 for 1.46 mM Ca2+, p = 0.0007 for 1.64 mm Ca2+, unpaired two-sided t-test. (f) Summary of EC50 of Ca2+ for half-blocking of IPSCs and the blocking effect of 0.2 mM Ca2+ on IPSC amplitude. Ctrl (n = 7), TKO (n = 9), p = 0.0139, p = 0.3985, unpaired two-sided t-test. Data are means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Number of neurons are indicated in the graph (e) or bars (f). Statistical differences were assessed by Student’s t-test (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Figure 4—figure supplement 1.
Figure 4—figure supplement 1.. Pan-neurexin deletion enhances the blocking effects of reducing extracellular Ca2+ on glycinergic synaptic transmission.
(a) Summary of eIPSC amplitude of control during 0.2 mM Ca2+ perfusion. Mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). (b) Summary of eIPSC amplitude of TKO during 0.2 mM Ca2+ perfusion. Mean ± SEM. (c) Average of eIPSC amplitude before and after 0.2 mM Ca2+ perfusion. Mean ± SEM (**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001), paired t-test.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. Deletion of neurexins increases the blocking effect of EGTA on glycinergic inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs).
(a) Representative time courses of IPSC amplitudes for individual lateral superior olive (LSO) neurons of control mice during the treatment of high concentration of EGTA-AM. (b) Representative IPSC traces of control mice before and after EGTA. (c, d) Same as a, b, except of TKO mice. (e) Summary of IPSC amplitude before and after EGTA treatment of control mice. Ctrl (n = 7), TKO (n = 7), p = 0.0201, paired two-sided t-test. (f) Summary of IPSC amplitude before and after EGTA treatment of TKO mice. Ctrl (n = 7), TKO (n = 7), p = 0.0123, paired two-sided t-test. (g) Summary of the blocking percentage of IPSCs by EGTA. Ctrl (n = 7), TKO (n = 7), p = 0.0001, unpaired two-sided t-test. Data are means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Number of neurons are indicated in the bars (e–g). Statistical differences were assessed by Student’s t-test (*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Figure 5—figure supplement 1.
Figure 5—figure supplement 1.. Pan-neurexin deletion enhances the blocking effects of intracellular Ca2+ buffer on glycinergic synaptic transmission.
(a) Summary of eIPSC amplitude of control during 10 mM EGTA-AM treatment. Mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). (b) Summary of eIPSC amplitude of TKO during 10 mM EGTA-AM treatment. Mean ± SEM.

Update of

References

    1. Anderson GR, Aoto J, Tabuchi K, Földy C, Covy J, Yee AX, Wu D, Lee SJ, Chen L, Malenka RC, Südhof TC. β-Neurexins control neural circuits by regulating synaptic endocannabinoid signaling. Cell. 2015;162:593–606. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.056. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aoto J, Martinelli DC, Malenka RC, Tabuchi K, Südhof TC. Presynaptic neurexin-3 alternative splicing trans-synaptically controls postsynaptic AMPA receptor trafficking. Cell. 2013;154:75–88. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.060. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aoto J, Földy C, Ilcus SMC, Tabuchi K, Südhof TC. Distinct circuit-dependent functions of presynaptic neurexin-3 at GABAergic and glutamatergic synapses. Nature Neuroscience. 2015;18:997–1007. doi: 10.1038/nn.4037. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Assareh N, Fenech C, Power R, Uddin MN, Otsu Y, Aubrey KR. Bidirectional Modulation of Nociception by GlyT2+ Neurons in the Ventrolateral Periaqueductal Gray. eNeuro. 2023;10:ENEURO.0069-23.2023. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0069-23.2023. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beiderbeck B, Myoga MH, Müller NIC, Callan AR, Friauf E, Grothe B, Pecka M. Precisely timed inhibition facilitates action potential firing for spatial coding in the auditory brainstem. Nature Communications. 2018;9:1771. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04210-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms