Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Oct;397(10):7551-7560.
doi: 10.1007/s00210-024-03155-y. Epub 2024 May 30.

The neuropharmacological profile of interval responding during operant tasks

Affiliations
Review

The neuropharmacological profile of interval responding during operant tasks

Robert Lalonde et al. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Responses occurring during intervals of operant tasks have been subdivided as interim, facultative, and terminal, depending on the time between response onset and reward. Although interval responses, also known as adjunctive responses, have been described in pigeons, rats, mice, monkeys, and humans, most experiments have been conducted in rats. We review the neurochemical basis of interval responses and examine the hypothesis that these responses modulate operant performance. Preliminary experiments indicate the involvement of biogenic amines, acetylcholine, and GABA during interval responding associated with operant tasks. In particular, catecholaminergic deafferentation of the basal ganglia modulated interval responses as did the peripheral injection of catecholamine reuptake blockers. Under the influence of amphetamine, interval responding may either increase or decrease, so that a wide range of responses must be selected to gauge drug effects. In non-drugged pigeons and rats, the expression of interval responses facilitates operant training.

Keywords: Acetylcholine; Adjunctive responses; Catecholamines; Differential reinforcement of low rate; Hippocampus; Operant responses; Prefrontal cortex.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Acsádi G, Buzsáki G, Keszthelyi T, Királyfalvi L, Gage FH (1986) Effects of confinement, previous experience and hippocampal damage on the DRL schedule. Behav Brain Res 20(2):241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4328(86)90007-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ananth J, Solyom L, Bryntwick S, Krishnappa U (1979) Chlorimipramine therapy for obsessive-compulsive neurosis. Am J Psychiatry 136(5):700–701. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.136.5.700 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Avanzi M, Uber E, Bonfà F (2004) Pathological gambling in two patients on dopamine replacement therapy for Parkinson’s disease. Neurol Sci 25(2):98–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-004-0238-z - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baum WM (2012) Rethinking reinforcement: allocation, induction, and contingency. J Exp Anal Behav 97(1):101–124. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2012.97-101 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Baum WM (2018) Multiscale behavior analysis and molar behaviorism: an overview. J Exp Anal Behav 110(3):302–322. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.476 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources