The neuropharmacological profile of interval responding during operant tasks
- PMID: 38814460
- DOI: 10.1007/s00210-024-03155-y
The neuropharmacological profile of interval responding during operant tasks
Abstract
Responses occurring during intervals of operant tasks have been subdivided as interim, facultative, and terminal, depending on the time between response onset and reward. Although interval responses, also known as adjunctive responses, have been described in pigeons, rats, mice, monkeys, and humans, most experiments have been conducted in rats. We review the neurochemical basis of interval responses and examine the hypothesis that these responses modulate operant performance. Preliminary experiments indicate the involvement of biogenic amines, acetylcholine, and GABA during interval responding associated with operant tasks. In particular, catecholaminergic deafferentation of the basal ganglia modulated interval responses as did the peripheral injection of catecholamine reuptake blockers. Under the influence of amphetamine, interval responding may either increase or decrease, so that a wide range of responses must be selected to gauge drug effects. In non-drugged pigeons and rats, the expression of interval responses facilitates operant training.
Keywords: Acetylcholine; Adjunctive responses; Catecholamines; Differential reinforcement of low rate; Hippocampus; Operant responses; Prefrontal cortex.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Effects of amphetamine on differential reinforcement of low rates of responding.Behav Pharmacol. 2007 Mar;18(2):119-33. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e3280ae6caa. Behav Pharmacol. 2007. PMID: 17351419
-
Catecholamines and drug-behavior interactions.Fed Proc. 1975 Aug;34(9):1823-31. Fed Proc. 1975. PMID: 1097267 Review.
-
Dopamine receptor antagonists reverse amphetamine-induced behavioral alteration on a differential reinforcement for low-rate (DRL) operant task in the rat.Chin J Physiol. 2007 Apr 30;50(2):77-88. Chin J Physiol. 2007. PMID: 17608145
-
Genetic differences in NMDA and D1 receptor levels, and operant responding for food and morphine in Lewis and Fischer 344 rats.Brain Res. 2003 May 30;973(2):205-13. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(03)02482-x. Brain Res. 2003. PMID: 12738064
-
Antidepressant effects assessed using behavior maintained under a differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate (DRL) operant schedule.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005;29(4-5):785-98. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.03.018. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005. PMID: 15893376 Review.
References
-
- Acsádi G, Buzsáki G, Keszthelyi T, Királyfalvi L, Gage FH (1986) Effects of confinement, previous experience and hippocampal damage on the DRL schedule. Behav Brain Res 20(2):241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4328(86)90007-0 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ananth J, Solyom L, Bryntwick S, Krishnappa U (1979) Chlorimipramine therapy for obsessive-compulsive neurosis. Am J Psychiatry 136(5):700–701. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.136.5.700 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Avanzi M, Uber E, Bonfà F (2004) Pathological gambling in two patients on dopamine replacement therapy for Parkinson’s disease. Neurol Sci 25(2):98–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-004-0238-z - DOI - PubMed
-
- Baum WM (2012) Rethinking reinforcement: allocation, induction, and contingency. J Exp Anal Behav 97(1):101–124. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2012.97-101 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Baum WM (2018) Multiscale behavior analysis and molar behaviorism: an overview. J Exp Anal Behav 110(3):302–322. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.476 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources