Long-Term Outcomes in Patients Using Protocol-Directed Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
- PMID: 38814624
- PMCID: PMC11140579
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.6695
Long-Term Outcomes in Patients Using Protocol-Directed Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
Abstract
Importance: Outcomes from protocol-directed active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancers are needed to support decision-making.
Objective: To characterize the long-term oncological outcomes of patients receiving active surveillance in a multicenter, protocol-directed cohort.
Design, setting, and participants: The Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study (PASS) is a prospective cohort study initiated in 2008. A cohort of 2155 men with favorable-risk prostate cancer and no prior treatment were enrolled at 10 North American centers through August 2022.
Exposure: Active surveillance for prostate cancer.
Main outcomes and measures: Cumulative incidence of biopsy grade reclassification, treatment, metastasis, prostate cancer mortality, overall mortality, and recurrence after treatment in patients treated after the first or subsequent surveillance biopsies.
Results: Among 2155 patients with localized prostate cancer, the median follow-up was 7.2 years, median age was 63 years, 83% were White, 7% were Black, 90% were diagnosed with grade group 1 cancer, and median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 5.2 ng/mL. Ten years after diagnosis, the incidence of biopsy grade reclassification and treatment were 43% (95% CI, 40%-45%) and 49% (95% CI, 47%-52%), respectively. There were 425 and 396 patients treated after confirmatory or subsequent surveillance biopsies (median of 1.5 and 4.6 years after diagnosis, respectively) and the 5-year rates of recurrence were 11% (95% CI, 7%-15%) and 8% (95% CI, 5%-11%), respectively. Progression to metastatic cancer occurred in 21 participants and there were 3 prostate cancer-related deaths. The estimated rates of metastasis or prostate cancer-specific mortality at 10 years after diagnosis were 1.4% (95% CI, 0.7%-2%) and 0.1% (95% CI, 0%-0.4%), respectively; overall mortality in the same time period was 5.1% (95% CI, 3.8%-6.4%).
Conclusions and relevance: In this study, 10 years after diagnosis, 49% of men remained free of progression or treatment, less than 2% developed metastatic disease, and less than 1% died of their disease. Later progression and treatment during surveillance were not associated with worse outcomes. These results demonstrate active surveillance as an effective management strategy for patients diagnosed with favorable-risk prostate cancer.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures



Similar articles
-
Polygenic Risk Score and Upgrading in Patients With Prostate Cancer Receiving Active Surveillance.JAMA Oncol. 2025 Feb 1;11(2):168-171. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.5398. JAMA Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39666350
-
Personalized Dynamic Prediction Model for Biopsy Timing in Patients With Prostate Cancer During Active Surveillance.JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2454366. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54366. JAMA Netw Open. 2025. PMID: 39820695 Free PMC article.
-
Prostate Cancer Mortality in Men Aged 70 Years Who Recently Underwent Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening.JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2459766. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.59766. JAMA Netw Open. 2025. PMID: 39951264 Free PMC article.
-
Screening for prostate cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;2013(1):CD004720. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004720.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 23440794 Free PMC article.
-
Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Screening for Prostate Cancer: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1914-1931. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3712. JAMA. 2018. PMID: 29801018
Cited by
-
Erectile dysfunction associated with prostate cancer treatment and therapeutic advances: a narrative review.Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Nov 30;13(11):2625-2643. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-514. Epub 2024 Nov 28. Transl Androl Urol. 2024. PMID: 39698570 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Magnetic Resonance Imaging at Second Surveillance Biopsy After Diagnosis in Patients With Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer in the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study.J Urol. 2025 Sep;214(3):251-258. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004592. Epub 2025 Apr 30. J Urol. 2025. PMID: 40305682
-
Prostate cancer in people with HIV.Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2025 Feb 1;38(1):10-17. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000001076. Epub 2024 Nov 28. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2025. PMID: 39624951 Review.
-
Genomic Signatures Correlating With Adverse Pathologic Features in Men Eligible for Active Surveillance.Prostate. 2025 Sep;85(12):1114-1120. doi: 10.1002/pros.24924. Epub 2025 Jun 20. Prostate. 2025. PMID: 40539849 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term outcomes of LDR-brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.Front Oncol. 2025 Jan 16;14:1326355. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1326355. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39886674 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hoffman KE, Penson DF, Zhao Z, et al. . Patient-reported outcomes through 5 years for active surveillance, surgery, brachytherapy, or external beam radiation with or without androgen deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 2020;323(2):149-163. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.20675 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Chen RC, Rumble RB, Loblaw DA, et al. . Active surveillance for the management of localized prostate cancer (Cancer Care Ontario Guideline): American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(18):2182-2190. doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.65.7759 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous