Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 1;13(5):26.
doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.5.26.

Impact of Physical Activity Frequency, Duration, and Intensity on Senile Cataract Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study

Affiliations

Impact of Physical Activity Frequency, Duration, and Intensity on Senile Cataract Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study

Yuze Mi et al. Transl Vis Sci Technol. .

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to determine the causal effects of physical activities with different frequencies, durations, and intensities on the risk of senile cataracts using Mendelian randomization (MR).

Methods: A bidirectional two-sample MR approach was used to determine the association between physical activity and senile cataract risk. Our primary analysis used the inverse variance weighted method, and secondary analyses included MR-Egger regression, MR-PRESSO, and Cochran's Q statistic to evaluate heterogeneity and pleiotropy. Causal estimates were presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

Results: Genetically predicted moderate physical activity ≥ 10 min/wk (OR = 0.765, 95% CI = 0.627-0.936, P = 8.73E-03), vigorous physical activity ≥ 10 min/wk (OR = 0.691, 95% CI = 0.521-0.917, P = 1.04E-02), moderate-to-vigorous physical activity levels (OR = 0.552, 95% CI = 0.369-0.823, P = 3.75E-03), and overall acceleration average (OR = 0.952, 95% CI = 0.926-0.978, P = 3.80E-04) were associated with a decreased risk of senile cataract while walking ≥ 10 min/wk (OR = 0.972, 95% CI = 0.741-1.275, P = 8.36E-01) had no significant correlation. The reverse MR analysis showed no reversal causality from senile cataract to physical activity except for walking ≥ 10 min/wk (OR = 0.951, 95% CI = 0.923-0.979, P = 7.30E-04).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that moderate to vigorous physical activity with higher frequency and longer duration will causally reduce the risk of senile cataracts, and there is no reverse causal relationship.

Translational relevance: These findings underscore the potential of incorporating physical activity into preventive health strategies for senile cataracts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: Y. Mi, None; Q. Zhu, None; Y. Chen, None; X. Zheng, None; M. Wan, None; Y. Li, None

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Design flow chart for the Mendelian randomization study. SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; WM, weighted median; MR, Mendelian randomization; IV, instrumental variable.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
MR estimates, heterogeneity, and pleiotropy analysis for the causal effect of physical activity on senile cataract. MR, Mendelian randomization; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; IVW, inverse variance weighted, Walking ≥ 10 min/wk: number of days per week walked for 10 or more minutes; MPA ≥ 10 min/wk, number of days per week of moderate physical activity for 10 or more minutes; VPA ≥ 10 min/wk, number of days per week of vigorous physical activity for 10 or more minutes; MVPA, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity levels; OAA, overall acceleration average.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
MR estimates, heterogeneity, and pleiotropy analysis for the causal effect of senile cataract on physical activity. MR, Mendelian randomization; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; IVW, inverse variance weighted; Walking ≥ 10 min/wk, number of days per week walked for 10 or more minutes; MPA ≥ 10 min/wk, number of days per week of moderate physical activity for 10 or more minutes; VPA ≥ 10 min/wk, number of days per week of vigorous physical activity for 10 or more minutes; MVPA, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity levels; OAA, overall acceleration average.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tanito M. Reported evidence of vitamin E protection against cataract and glaucoma. Free Radic Biol Med. 2021; 177: 100–119. - PubMed
    1. GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators; Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021; 9(2): e144–e160. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hashemi H, Pakzad R, Yekta A, et al. .. Global and regional prevalence of age-related cataract: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Eye (Lond). 2020; 34(8): 1357–1370. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pascolini D, Mariotti SP.. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012; 96(5): 614–618. - PubMed
    1. Flaxman SR, Bourne RRA, Resnikoff S, et al. .. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990-2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017; 5(12): e1221–e1234. - PubMed

Publication types