Nasotracheal intubation versus tracheostomy for intermittent positive pressure ventilation in neonatal tetanus
- PMID: 3881495
- DOI: 10.1007/BF00256062
Nasotracheal intubation versus tracheostomy for intermittent positive pressure ventilation in neonatal tetanus
Abstract
Fifty-two neonates with tetanus who required muscle paralysis and IPPV were managed alternatively with naso-tracheal intubation or tracheostomy. The complications of the two techniques were compared. Planned extubation caused less problems in the intubated than in the tracheostomized children, and secondary infection occurred less often. Accidental extubation, however, was a significant hazard in the intubated child.
Similar articles
-
A self-inflating cuffed neonate tracheostomy tube suitable for intermittent positive-pressure respiration.Lancet. 1967 Aug 12;2(7511):345-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)90179-1. Lancet. 1967. PMID: 4143732 No abstract available.
-
Subglottic stenosis after nasal endotracheal intubation.Br Med J. 1966 Aug 20;2(5511):451-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5511.451. Br Med J. 1966. PMID: 5330327 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Mechanical ventilation in newborn infants.Afr J Med Med Sci. 1988 Jun;17(2):83-8. Afr J Med Med Sci. 1988. PMID: 2843022
-
Early development: intermittent mandatory ventilation in neonatal respiratory support.Int Anesthesiol Clin. 1980 Summer;18(2):39-51. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 1980. PMID: 7007250 Review. No abstract available.
-
Synchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation of the Newborn: Technical Issues and Clinical Results.Neonatology. 2016;109(4):359-65. doi: 10.1159/000444898. Epub 2016 Jun 3. Neonatology. 2016. PMID: 27251453 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical