Pars Plana Vitrectomy With Silicone Oil or Gas Tamponade for Uncomplicated Retinal Detachment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with silicone oil compared to gas tamponade for uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted on Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from January 2000 to September 2023 for comparative studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of PPV with either silicone oil or gas tamponade in the setting of uncomplicated RRD. Our primary outcome was best-corrected visual acuity at the last study observation. Secondary outcomes included the rates of retinal reattachment, retinal thickness, and the incidence of adverse events. We performed a meta-analysis using a random-effects model.

Results: Nine observational studies reporting on 491 RRD eyes were included. The mean best-corrected visual acuity at the last study observation was significantly better in the gas tamponade group than in the silicone oil group (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 0.17 logMAR, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.06, 0.27], P = .002). Rates of primary retinal reattachment were similar between the silicone oil and gas tamponade groups (P = .89). The ganglion cell layer was significantly thinner in the silicone oil group compared to the gas tamponade group (WMD =-3.70 µm, 95% CI = [-5.87, -1.53, P = .0008), as was the inner plexiform layer (WMD = -2.45, 95% CI = [-4.50, -0.40], P = .02) and outer nuclear layer (WMD = -11.74 µm, 95% CI = [-18.39, -5.10], P = .0005).

Conclusions: PPV with gas tamponade was associated with better functional outcomes compared to PPV with silicone oil, although both tamponades yielded comparable primary reattachment rates. The absence of randomized trials and the potential for selection bias underscore the importance of further investigation in diverse patient populations.