Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 30;24(1):114.
doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01498-5.

The key role of major and trace elements in the formation of five common urinary stones

Yu Tian  1 , Guilin Han  2   3 , Shudong Zhang  4 , Ziyang Ding  5   6 , Rui Qu  5   6
Affiliations

The key role of major and trace elements in the formation of five common urinary stones

Yu Tian et al. BMC Urol. .

Abstract

Background: Urolithiasis has emerged as a global affliction, recognized as one of the most excruciating medical issues. The elemental composition of stones provides crucial information, aiding in understanding the causes, mechanisms, and individual variations in stone formation. By understanding the interactions between elements in various types of stones and exploring the key role of elements in stone formation, insights are provided for the prevention and treatment of urinary stone disease.

Methods: This study collected urinary stone samples from 80 patients in Beijing. The chemical compositions of urinary stones were identified using an infrared spectrometer. The concentrations of major and trace elements in the urinary stones were determined using Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES) and Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS), respectively. The data were processed using correlation analysis and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) methods.

Results: Urinary stones are categorized into five types: the calcium oxalate (CO) stone, carbonate apatite (CA) stone, uric acid (UA) stone, mixed CO and CA stone, and mixed CO and UA stone. Ca is the predominant element, with an average content ranging from 2.64 to 27.68% across the five stone groups. Based on geochemical analysis, the high-content elements follow this order: Ca > Mg > Na > K > Zn > Sr. Correlation analysis and PCA suggested significant variations in the interactions between elements for different types of urinary stones. Trace elements with charges and ionic structures similar to Ca may substitute for Ca during the process of stone formation, such as Sr and Pb affecting the Ca in most stone types except mixed stone types. Moreover, the Mg, Zn and Ba can substitute for Ca in the mixed stone types, showing element behavior dependents on the stone types.

Conclusion: This study primarily reveals distinct elemental features associated with five types of urinary stones. Additionally, the analysis of these elements indicates that substitutions of trace elements with charges and ion structures similar to Ca (such as Sr and Pb) impact most stone types. This suggests a dependence of stone composition on elemental behavior. The findings of this study will enhance our ability to address the challenges posed by urinary stones to global health and improve the precision of interventions for individuals with different stone compositions.

Keywords: Elemental composition; Principal component analysis; Trace element; Urinary stones.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Correlation analysis of the chemical components of urinary stones. a. CO; b. CA; c).UA; d. CO + CA; e. CO + UA; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
PCA of the chemical components of urinary stones. a. CO; b. CA; c. UA; d. CO + CA; e. CO + UA
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Abufaraj M, Xu T, Cao, C, Waldhoer T, Seitz C, D’andrea D, Siyam A, Tarawneh R, Fajkovic H, Schernhammer E, & Yang L. Prevalence and Trends in Kidney Stone Among Adults in the USA: Analyses of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007–2018 Data. Eur. Urol. Focus. 2021;7(6):1468–75. 10.1016/j.euf.2020.08.011. - PubMed
    1. Edvardsson VO, Indridason OS, Haraldsson G, Kjartansson O, Palsson R. Temporal trends in the incidence of kidney stone disease. Kidney Int. 2013;83(1):146–52. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.320. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chandrajith R, Wijewardana G, Dissanayake CB, Abeygunasekara A. Biomineralogy of human urinary calculi (kidney stones) from some geographic regions of Sri Lanka.Environ. Geochem Health. 2006;28(4):393–9. doi: 10.1007/s10653-006-9048-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang W, Fan J, Huang G, Li J, Zhu X, Tian Y, Su L. Prevalence of kidney stones in mainland China: a systematic review. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):41630. doi: 10.1038/srep41630. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. López M. Hoppe. History, epidemiology and regional diversities of urolithiasis. Pediatr Nephrol. 2010;25(1):49–59. doi: 10.1007/s00467-008-0960-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed