Enhancing reporting through structure: a before and after study on the effectiveness of SPIRIT-based templates to improve the completeness of reporting of randomized controlled trial protocols
- PMID: 38816752
- PMCID: PMC11140857
- DOI: 10.1186/s41073-024-00147-7
Enhancing reporting through structure: a before and after study on the effectiveness of SPIRIT-based templates to improve the completeness of reporting of randomized controlled trial protocols
Abstract
Background: Despite the improvements in the completeness of reporting of randomized trial protocols after the publication of the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trial (SPIRIT) guidelines, many items remain poorly reported. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of using SPIRIT-tailored templates for trial protocols to improve the completeness of reporting of the protocols that master's students write as part of their master's theses.
Methods: Before and after experimental study performed at the University Master's Degree in Orthopaedic Manual Physiotherapy of the Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (Barcelona, Spain). While students in the post-intervention period were instructed to use a trial protocol template that was tailored to SPIRIT, students in the pre-intervention period did not use the template.
Primary outcome: Difference between the pre- and post-intervention periods in the mean number of adequately reported items (0-10 scale). The outcomes were evaluated independently and in duplicate by two blinded assessors. Students and their supervisors were not aware that they were part of a research project. For the statistical analysis, we used a generalized linear regression model (dependent variable: number of adequately reported items in the protocol; independent variables: intervention period, call, language).
Results: Thirty-four trial protocols were included (17, pre-intervention; 17, post-intervention). Protocols produced during the post-intervention period (mean: 8.24; SD: 1.52) were more completely reported than those produced during the pre-intervention period (mean: 6.35; SD: 1.80); adjusted difference: 1.79 (95% CI: 0.58 to 3.00).
Conclusions: SPIRIT-based templates could be used to improve the completeness of reporting of randomized trial protocols.
Keywords: Clinical trial protocol; Meta-research; Randomized controlled trial; Reporting guidelines; Reporting quality.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Reminding Peer Reviewers of Reporting Guideline Items to Improve Completeness in Published Articles: Primary Results of 2 Randomized Trials.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2317651. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17651. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 37294569 Free PMC article.
-
Has the reporting quality of published randomised controlled trial protocols improved since the SPIRIT statement? A methodological study.BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 26;10(8):e038283. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038283. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32847919 Free PMC article.
-
Rationale and design of repeated cross-sectional studies to evaluate the reporting quality of trial protocols: the Adherence to SPIrit REcommendations (ASPIRE) study and associated projects.Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):896. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04808-y. Trials. 2020. PMID: 33115541 Free PMC article.
-
Concordance with SPIRIT-AI guidelines in reporting of randomized controlled trial protocols investigating artificial intelligence in oncology: a systematic review.Oncologist. 2025 May 8;30(5):oyaf112. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf112. Oncologist. 2025. PMID: 40421957 Free PMC article.
-
The Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) in a systematic review of exercise-based rehabilitation effectiveness: completeness of reporting, rater agreement, and utility.Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 Jun;55(3):342-352. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05791-5. Epub 2019 Apr 3. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2019. PMID: 30947493 Review.
Cited by
-
SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.BMJ. 2025 Apr 28;389:e081660. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081660. BMJ. 2025. PMID: 40294956 Free PMC article.
-
SPIRIT 2025 statement: Updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.PLoS Med. 2025 Apr 28;22(4):e1004589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004589. eCollection 2025 Apr. PLoS Med. 2025. PMID: 40294521 Free PMC article.
-
SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.BMJ. 2025 Apr 28;389:e081477. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081477. BMJ. 2025. PMID: 40294953 Free PMC article.
-
SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomized trials.Nat Med. 2025 Jun;31(6):1784-1792. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03668-w. Epub 2025 Apr 29. Nat Med. 2025. PMID: 40295741 Review.
References
-
- Speich B, Mann E, Schönenberger CM, Mellor K, Griessbach AN, Dhiman P, et al. Reminding Peer Reviewers of Reporting Guideline Items to Improve Completeness in Published Articles: Primary Results of 2 Randomized Trials. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(6):e2317651–e2317651. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17651. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous