Tricuspid valve flow measurement using a deep learning framework for automated valve-tracking 2D phase contrast
- PMID: 38817154
- PMCID: PMC11341256
- DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30163
Tricuspid valve flow measurement using a deep learning framework for automated valve-tracking 2D phase contrast
Abstract
Purpose: Tricuspid valve flow velocities are challenging to measure with cardiovascular MR, as the rapidly moving valvular plane prohibits direct flow evaluation, but they are vitally important to diastolic function evaluation. We developed an automated valve-tracking 2D method for measuring flow through the dynamic tricuspid valve.
Methods: Nine healthy subjects and 2 patients were imaged. The approach uses a previously trained deep learning network, TVnet, to automatically track the tricuspid valve plane from long-axis cine images. Subsequently, the tracking information is used to acquire 2D phase contrast (PC) with a dynamic (moving) acquisition plane that tracks the valve. Direct diastolic net flows evaluated from the dynamic PC sequence were compared with flows from 2D-PC scans acquired in a static slice localized at the end-systolic valve position, and also ventricular stroke volumes (SVs) using both planimetry and 2D PC of the great vessels.
Results: The mean tricuspid valve systolic excursion was 17.8 ± 2.5 mm. The 2D valve-tracking PC net diastolic flow showed excellent correlation with SV by right-ventricle planimetry (bias ± 1.96 SD = -0.2 ± 10.4 mL, intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.92) and aortic PC (-1.0 ± 13.8 mL, ICC = 0.87). In comparison, static tricuspid valve 2D PC also showed a strong correlation but had greater bias (p = 0.01) versus the right-ventricle SV (10.6 ± 16.1 mL, ICC = 0.61). In most (8 of 9) healthy subjects, trace regurgitation was measured at begin-systole. In one patient, valve-tracking PC displayed a high-velocity jet (380 cm/s) with maximal velocity agreeing with echocardiography.
Conclusion: Automated valve-tracking 2D PC is a feasible route toward evaluation of tricuspid regurgitant velocities, potentially solving a major clinical challenge.
Keywords: deep learning; phase contrast; regurgitation; slice‐following; tricuspid valve.
© 2024 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Similar articles
-
4D flow MRI quantification of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation: Reproducibility and consistency relative to conventional MRI.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Oct;48(4):1147-1158. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26040. Epub 2018 Apr 11. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018. PMID: 29638024 Free PMC article.
-
Quantification of tricuspid regurgitation using two-dimensional velocity encoding cine: optimal plane and reproducibility.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Dec;31 Suppl 2:233-40. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0715-x. Epub 2015 Jul 25. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015. PMID: 26208682
-
Automated quantification of mitral inflow and aortic outflow stroke volumes by three-dimensional real-time volume color-flow Doppler transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with pulsed-wave Doppler and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012 Jan;25(1):56-65. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2011.10.004. Epub 2011 Nov 21. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012. PMID: 22105057
-
Tricuspid flow and regurgitation in congenital heart disease and pulmonary hypertension: comparison of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018 Jan 15;20(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12968-017-0426-7. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018. PMID: 29332606 Free PMC article.
-
The relationship between "normal" transesophageal color-flow Doppler-defined tricuspid regurgitation and thermodilution right ventricular ejection fraction measurements.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1993 Apr;7(2):167-74. doi: 10.1016/1053-0770(93)90211-3. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1993. PMID: 8477021 Review.
Cited by
-
Diastolic dysfunction evaluation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance derived E, a, e': Comparison to echocardiography.Physiol Rep. 2024 Dec;12(23):e70078. doi: 10.14814/phy2.70078. Physiol Rep. 2024. PMID: 39604208 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mutlak D, Aronson D, Lessick J, Reisner SA, Dabbah S, Agmon Y. Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension Is Pulmonary Artery Pressure the Only Determinant of Regurgitation Severity? Chest 2009;135(1):115–121. - PubMed
-
- Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, Gentile F, Jneid H, Krieger EV, Mack M, McLeod C, O’Gara PT, Rigolin VH, Sundt TM, Thompson A, Toly C. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2021;143(5):e72–e227. - PubMed
-
- Uretsky S, Argulian E, Narula J, Wolff SD. Use of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessing Mitral Regurgitation: Current Evidence. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;71(5):547–563. - PubMed
-
- Uretsky S, Gillam L, Lang R, Chaudhry FA, Argulian E, Supariwala A, Gurram S, Jain K, Subero M, Jang JJ, Cohen R, Wolff SD. Discordance Between Echocardiography and MRI in the Assessment of Mitral Regurgitation Severity A Prospective Multicenter Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65(11):1078–1088. - PubMed
-
- Zhan Y, Senapati A, Vejpongsa P, Xu J, Shah DJ, Nagueh SF. Comparison of Echocardiographic Assessment of Tricuspid Regurgitation Against Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2020;13(7):1461–1471. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources