Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 16:15:1335707.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1335707. eCollection 2024.

Similarity judgements: the comparison of normative predictions and subjective evaluations - A study of the ratio model of similarity in social context

Magdalena Zyta Jabłońska  1 , Andrzej Falkowski  1 , Robert Mackiewicz  1
Affiliations

Similarity judgements: the comparison of normative predictions and subjective evaluations - A study of the ratio model of similarity in social context

Magdalena Zyta Jabłońska et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Introduction: This study examines the consistency between subjective similarity evaluations and the theoretical predictions derived from Tversky's ratio model of similarity, alongside the impact of additional positive and negative features on perceived similarity to ideal and bad politicians.

Methods: Using a sample of 120 participants, we assessed the similarity of eight candidate profiles to an ideal and bad politician, varying in positive and negative features. Participants' subjective evaluations were compared with theoretical predictions derived from Tversky's ratio model. The analysis focused on how candidate and referent valence influenced observed versus theoretical similarity.

Results: Subjective similarity judgments deviated systematically from theoretical predictions, especially for positively featured candidates, indicating a negativity effect. Additional positive features decreased the perceived similarity of favorable candidates to an ideal politician, while additional negative features did not significantly affect similarity judgments of unfavorable candidates.

Discussion: Our findings underscore a significant disparity between subjective and objective similarity judgments, notably for favorable candidates. While the ratio model performs well for unfavorable candidates, its applicability diminishes for favorable ones, emphasizing the role of feature valence in decision-making. Further research on feature valence is crucial for a comprehensive understanding across contexts.

Keywords: objective similarity; positive-negative asymmetry; ratio model; similarity judgements; subjective similarity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The figure illustrates the objective (theoretical) and subjective (observed) similarity to both an ideal and bad politician for candidate profiles differing in the number of positive and negative features attributed to them (x-axis). Dashed lines depict the theoretical predictions, while solid lines represent empirical findings. Lighter lines indicate similarity to an ideal politician, whereas darker lines signify similarity to a bad politician.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
The differences between observed and predicted similarity measures for similarity to an ideal and bad politician for favourable and unfavourable candidates. Positive values indicate that the observed similarity values are higher than the predicted values.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. American Psychological Association [APA] (2010). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
    1. Baumeister R. F., Bratslavsky E., Finkenauer C., Vohs K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 5 323–370. 10.1037//1089-2680.5.4.323 - DOI
    1. Blanz M., Mummendey A., Otten S. (1995). Positive – negative asymmetry in social discrimination: The impact of stimulus valence and size and status differentials on intergroup evaluations. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 34 409–419. 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1995.tb01074.x - DOI
    1. Carstensen L. L., Mikels J. A. (2005). At the intersection of emotion and cognition: Aging and the positivity effect. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 14 117–121. 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00348 - DOI
    1. Christenfeld N. (1995). Choices from identical options. Psychol. Sci. 6 50–55.