Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 16:15:1106709.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1106709. eCollection 2024.

Community-based breeding programs can realize sustainable genetic gain and economic benefits in tropical dairy cattle systems

Direba Hunde  1   2 , Yosef Tadesse  2 , Million Tadesse  1 , Solomon Abegaz  3 , Tesfaye Getachew  4
Affiliations

Community-based breeding programs can realize sustainable genetic gain and economic benefits in tropical dairy cattle systems

Direba Hunde et al. Front Genet. .

Abstract

Implementing an appropriate breeding program is crucial to control fluctuation in performance, enhance adaptation, and further improve the crossbred population of dairy cattle. Five alternative breeding programs (BPs) were modeled considering available breeding units in the study area, the existing crossbreeding practices, and the future prospects of dairy research and development in Ethiopia. The study targeted 143,576 crossbred cows of 54,822 smallholder households in the Arsi, West Shewa, and North Shewa zones of the Oromia Region, as well as the North Shewa zone of the Amhara Region. The alternative BPs include conventional on-station progeny testing (SPT), conventional on-farm progeny testing (FPT), conventional on-station and on-farm progeny testing (SFPT), genomic selection (GS), and genomic progeny testing (GPT). Input parameters for modeling the BPs were taken from the analysis of long-term data obtained from the Holetta Agricultural Research Center and a survey conducted in the study area. ZPLAN+ software was used to predict estimates of genetic gain (GG) and discounted profit for goal traits. The predicted genetic gains (GGs) for milk yield (MY) per year were 34.52 kg, 49.63 kg, 29.35 kg, 76.16 kg, and 77.51 kg for SPT, FPT, SFPT, GS, and GPT, respectively. The GGs of the other goal traits range from 0.69 to 1.19 days per year for age at first calving, from 1.20 to 2.35 days per year for calving interval, and from 0.06 to 0.12 days per year for herd life. Compared to conventional BPs, genomic systems (GPT and GS) enhanced the GG of MY by 53%-164%, reduced generation interval by up to 21%, and improved the accuracy of test bull selection from 0.33 to 0.43. The discounted profit of the BPs varied from 249.58 Ethiopian Birr (ETB, 1 USD = 39.55696 ETB) per year in SPT to 689.79 ETB per year in GS. Genomic selection outperforms SPT, SFPT, and FPT by 266, 227%, and 138% of discounted profit, respectively. Community-based crossbreeding accompanied by GS and gradual support with progeny testing (GPT) is recommended as the main way forward to attain better genetic progress in dairy farms in Ethiopia and similar scenarios in other tropical countries.

Keywords: accuracy; community-based breeding; discounted profit; generation interval; genetic gain; smallholder.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

    1. Agajie T., Tadelle M., Tesfaye S., Yared D., Wudineh G., Tolesa A., et al. (2016). Adoption analysis of smallholder dairy production technologies in Oromia region, Ethiopia. Addis Ababa Ethiopia: Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research.
    1. Aliloo H., Mrode R., Okeyo A. M., Ni G., Goddard M. E., Gibson J. P. (2018). The feasibility of using low-density marker panels for genotype imputation and genomic prediction of crossbred dairy cattle of East Africa. J. Dairy Sci. 101, 9108–9127. 10.3168/jds.2018-14621 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Al Kalaldeh M., Marimuthu S., Yuvraj G., Sachin J., Hassan A., Eva M. S., et al. (2021). Genomic evaluation of milk yield in a smallholder crossbred dairy production system in India. Genet. Sel. Evol. 53, 73. 10.1186/s12711-021-00667-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Archer J. A., Barwick S. A., Graser H. U. (2004). Economic evaluation of beef cattle breeding schemes incorporating performance testing of young bulls for feed intake. Aust. J. Agric. Exp. 44, 393–404. 10.1071/EA02054 - DOI
    1. Aynalem H., Joshi B. K., Ayalew W., Tegegne A., Singh A. (2011). Genetic evaluation of Ethiopian Boran cattle and their crosses with Holstein Friesian for growth performance in central Ethiopia. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 128, 133–140. 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2010.00882.x - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources