Young people in iNaturalist: a blended learning framework for biodiversity monitoring
- PMID: 38818044
- PMCID: PMC11138322
- DOI: 10.1080/21548455.2023.2217472
Young people in iNaturalist: a blended learning framework for biodiversity monitoring
Abstract
Participation in authentic research in the field and online through Community and Citizen Science (CCS) has shown to bring learning benefits to volunteers. In online CCS, available platforms present distinct features, ranging from scaffolding the process of data collection, to supporting data analysis and enabling volunteers to initiate their own studies. What is yet not well understood is how best to design CCS programmes that are educational, inclusive, and accessible by diverse volunteers, including young people and those with limited prior science experiences who are rather few in CCS. In this study, we interviewed 31 young people, aged 7-20 years old, who used iNaturalist, an online biodiversity monitoring platform, and identified how different forms of participation online and in the field facilitated (or inhibited) certain forms of learning, as defined by the Environmental Science Agency framework. Findings revealed that iNaturalist enabled participation of young people including those with limited science experiences and facilitated science learning such as the development of science competence and understanding. A blended learning framework for biodiversity monitoring in CCS is presented as a means to support the development of hybrid, educational, and inclusive CCS programmes for young people.
Keywords: Community citizen science; biodiversity monitoring; blended learning; young people.
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Figures
References
-
- Anzul, M., Downing, M., Ely, M., & Vinz, R.. (1997). On writing qualitative research: Living by words. Routledge.
-
- Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Seakins, A., & Wong, B. (2015). “Science capital”: A conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 922–948. 10.1002/tea.21227 - DOI
-
- Aristeidou, M., & Herodotou, C. (2018). Tomorrow’s World nQuire: young people’s requirements for engaging with inquiry-led, civic engagement technologies. In Parsons D., Power R., Palalas A., Hambrock H., & MacCallum K. (Eds.), Proceedings of 17th world conference on mobile and contextual learning (mLearn 2018) (pp. 51–53). LearnTechLib.