Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Sep 12;37(3):e0014323.
doi: 10.1128/cmr.00143-23. Epub 2024 May 31.

Anaerobes in diabetic foot infections: pathophysiology, epidemiology, virulence, and management

Affiliations
Review

Anaerobes in diabetic foot infections: pathophysiology, epidemiology, virulence, and management

Fanny Villa et al. Clin Microbiol Rev. .

Abstract

SUMMARYDiabetic foot infections (DFI) are a public health problem worldwide. DFI are polymicrobial, biofilm-associated infections involving complex bacterial communities organized in functional equivalent pathogroups, all including anaerobes. Indeed, multiple pathophysiological factors favor the growth of anaerobes in this context. However, the prevalence, role, and contribution of anaerobes in wound evolution remain poorly characterized due to their challenging detection. Studies based on culture reviewed herein showed a weighted average of 17% of patients with anaerobes. Comparatively, the weighted average of patients with anaerobes identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing was 83.8%. Culture largely underestimated not only the presence but also the diversity of anaerobes compared with cultivation-independent approaches but both methods showed that anaerobic Gram-negative bacilli and Gram-positive cocci were the most commonly identified in DFI. Anaerobes were more present in deeper lesions, and their detection was associated with fever, malodorous lesions, and ulcer depth and duration. More specifically, initial abundance of Peptoniphilus spp. was associated with ulcer-impaired healing, Fusobacterium spp. detection was significantly correlated with the duration of DFI, and the presence of Bacteroides spp. was significantly associated with amputation. Antimicrobial resistance of anaerobes in DFI remains slightly studied and warrants more consideration in the context of increasing resistance of the most frequently identified anaerobes in DFI. The high rate of patients with DFI-involving anaerobes, the increased knowledge on the species identified, their virulence factors, and their potential role in wound evolution support recommendations combining debridement and antibiotic therapy effective on anaerobes in moderate and severe DFI.

Keywords: anaerobes; diabetic foot infection; diversity; epidemiology; management; pathophysiology; resistance; virulence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Results of the literature search on anaerobes in the context of diabetic foot infections (PubMed database, search date: February 16, 2024) and flow diagram of study selection.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Geographical heterogeneity in the relative prevalence of the main types of anaerobes cultivated from specimens sampled in patients with diabetic foot infections. GPAC, Gram-positive anaerobic cocci; GNAC, Gram-negative anaerobic cocci; GPAB, Gram-positive anaerobic bacilli; GNAB, Gram-negative anaerobic bacilli.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Main mechanisms of virulence developed by anaerobic Gram-positive cocci, notably Finegoldia magna. Four main virulence factors are involved at the different stages of infection: protein L in activation of immune system, PAB in invasion, SufA in invasion and escape from host immune system, and FAF in adhesion and colonization. Moreover, the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) by anaerobic Gram-positive cocci allows them to resist the action of anti-inflammatory immune cells and inhibit the fibroblasts and fibrinogen, which participate in the wound healing process. They also produce several hydrolytic enzymes (hyaluronidase, gelatinase, collagenase, and chondroitin sulfatase) causing tissue destruction. Finally, anaerobes are organized in biofilm to persist in the wound, participate in the chronicity of the ulcers, and collaborate with other aerobes and anaerobes in FEP.
Fig 4
Fig 4
Origin of anaerobes in diabetic foot infection; main anaerobes following the ulcer size and depth and their impact on wound outcome.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pitocco D, Spanu T, Di Leo M, Vitiello R, Rizzi A, Tartaglione L, Fiori B, Caputo S, Tinelli G, Zaccardi F, Flex A, Galli M, Pontecorvi A, Sanguinetti M. 2019. Diabetic foot infections: a comprehensive overview. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 23:26–37. doi:10.26355/eurrev_201904_17471 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Raspovic KM, Wukich DK. 2014. Self-reported quality of life and diabetic foot infections. J Foot Ankle Surg 53:716–719. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2014.06.011 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Armstrong DG, Boulton AJM, Bus SA. 2017. Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence. N Engl J Med 376:2367–2375. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1615439 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Prompers L, Huijberts M, Apelqvist J, Jude E, Piaggesi A, Bakker K, Edmonds M, Holstein P, Jirkovska A, Mauricio D, Ragnarson Tennvall G, Reike H, Spraul M, Uccioli L, Urbancic V, Van Acker K, van Baal J, van Merode F, Schaper N. 2007. High prevalence of ischaemia, infection and serious comorbidity in patients with diabetic foot disease in Europe. Baseline results from the Eurodiale study. Diabetologia 50:18–25. doi:10.1007/s00125-006-0491-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Louie TJ, Bartlett JG, Tally FP, Gorbach SL. 1976. Aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in diabetic foot ulcers. Ann Intern Med 85:461–463. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-85-4-461 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources