Performance of multiple therapeutic approaches for palatal wound healing after soft tissue graft removal - an overview of systematic reviews
- PMID: 38819478
- DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05733-z
Performance of multiple therapeutic approaches for palatal wound healing after soft tissue graft removal - an overview of systematic reviews
Abstract
Objective: To overview the literature to answer the following question: "What is the performance of different therapies on wound healing and postoperative discomfort after palatal ASTG removal?"
Methods: SRs that evaluated the wound healing (WH), postoperative pain, bleeding, and analgesic consumption of patients submitted to de-epithelialized/free gingival grafts (FGG) or subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTG) removed from the palate were included. The searches were conducted on six white and two gray databases up to December 2023. Methodological quality was evaluated through AMSTAR 2. The synthesis of results was described as a narrative analysis.
Results: Ten SRs (involving 25 randomized clinical trials) related to low-level laser therapy (LLLT) (3), platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) (4), cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives (CTA) (2), and ozone therapy (OT) (1) were included in this overview. All techniques demonstrated improvements in WH. LLT, PRF, and CTA reduced pain and analgesic consumption. PRF and CTA reduced bleeding. Regarding methodological quality, the SRs were classified as critically low (2), low (5), moderate (2), or high quality (1).
Conclusions: In SRs related to LLLT, PRF, CTA, and OT, the use of different therapies after palatal ASTG removal improved WH and postoperative discomfort. Due to the studies' low methodological quality and high heterogeneity, data should be interpreted with caution.
Clinical relevance: The present overview compiles the evidence of SRs related to different therapies for WH and patients' postoperative experience and reveals that different treatments can significantly improve the clinical outcomes of patients who require ASTG removal for periodontal or peri-implant surgeries.
Registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022301257.
Keywords: Autografts; Pain management; Patient outcome assessment; Postoperative complications; Re-epithelialization; Wound repair.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Barootchi S, Tavelli L, Zucchelli G, Giannobile WV, Wang H-L (2020) Gingival phenotype modification therapies on natural teeth: a network meta-analysis. J Periodontol 91:1386–1399. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.19-0715 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lu W, Qi G, Ding Z, Li X, Qi W, He F (2020) Clinical efficacy of acellular dermal matrix for plastic periodontal and implant surgery: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49:1057–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2019.12.005 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Avila-Ortiz G, Urban IA, Giannobile WV, Wang H-L (2021) Peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification and its impact on peri-implant health: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Periodontol 92:21–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.19-0716 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Stefanini M, Zucchelli G, Giannobile WV, Wang H-L (2023) Wound healing dynamics, morbidity, and complications of palatal soft-tissue harvesting. Periodontol 2000 92:90–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12466 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Huang J-P, Liu J-M, Wu Y-M, Dai A, Hu H-J, He F-M et al (2021) Clinical evaluation of xenogeneic collagen matrix versus free gingival grafts for keratinized mucosa augmentation around dental implants: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 48:1293–1301. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13518 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
