Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 25:26:e56780.
doi: 10.2196/56780.

Potential Roles of Large Language Models in the Production of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Affiliations

Potential Roles of Large Language Models in the Production of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Xufei Luo et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT have become widely applied in the field of medical research. In the process of conducting systematic reviews, similar tools can be used to expedite various steps, including defining clinical questions, performing the literature search, document screening, information extraction, and language refinement, thereby conserving resources and enhancing efficiency. However, when using LLMs, attention should be paid to transparent reporting, distinguishing between genuine and false content, and avoiding academic misconduct. In this viewpoint, we highlight the potential roles of LLMs in the creation of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, elucidating their advantages, limitations, and future research directions, aiming to provide insights and guidance for authors planning systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Keywords: ChatGPT; chatbot; large language model; meta-analysis; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The process of conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jahan N, Naveed S, Zeshan M, Tahir MA. How to conduct a systematic review: a narrative literature review. Cureus. 2016 Nov 04;8(11):e864. doi: 10.7759/cureus.864. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/27924252 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wallace SS, Barak G, Truong G, Parker MW. Hierarchy of evidence within the medical literature. Hosp Pediatr. 2022 Aug 01;12(8):745–750. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2022-006690.188605 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine. Board on Health Care Services. Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines. Graham R, Mancher M, Miller Wolman D, Greenfield S, Steinberg E. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011. - PubMed
    1. Bystranowski P, Janik B, Próchnicki M, Skórska P. Anchoring effect in legal decision-making: a meta-analysis. Law Hum Behav. 2021 Feb;45(1):1–23. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000438.2021-26899-001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Geyskens I, Krishnan R, Steenkamp JEM, Cunha PV. A review and evaluation of meta-analysis practices in management research. J Management. 2008 Feb 05;35(2):393–419. doi: 10.1177/0149206308328501. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources