Potential Roles of Large Language Models in the Production of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
- PMID: 38819655
- PMCID: PMC11234072
- DOI: 10.2196/56780
Potential Roles of Large Language Models in the Production of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT have become widely applied in the field of medical research. In the process of conducting systematic reviews, similar tools can be used to expedite various steps, including defining clinical questions, performing the literature search, document screening, information extraction, and language refinement, thereby conserving resources and enhancing efficiency. However, when using LLMs, attention should be paid to transparent reporting, distinguishing between genuine and false content, and avoiding academic misconduct. In this viewpoint, we highlight the potential roles of LLMs in the creation of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, elucidating their advantages, limitations, and future research directions, aiming to provide insights and guidance for authors planning systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Keywords: ChatGPT; chatbot; large language model; meta-analysis; systematic review.
©Xufei Luo, Fengxian Chen, Di Zhu, Ling Wang, Zijun Wang, Hui Liu, Meng Lyu, Ye Wang, Qi Wang, Yaolong Chen. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 25.06.2024.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Utility of Large Language Models for Health Care Professionals and Patients in Navigating Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Comparison of the Performance of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and Bard.J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 17;26:e54758. doi: 10.2196/54758. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 38758582 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the effectiveness of large language models in abstract screening: a comparative analysis.Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 21;13(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02609-x. Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39169386 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical and Surgical Applications of Large Language Models: A Systematic Review.J Clin Med. 2024 May 22;13(11):3041. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113041. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38892752 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Academic Surgery in the Era of Large Language Models: A Review.JAMA Surg. 2024 Apr 1;159(4):445-450. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.6496. JAMA Surg. 2024. PMID: 38353991 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluating the Quality of Guidelines Using the AGREE II Tool by a Large Language Model vs Human Appraisers.JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2512621. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.12621. JAMA Netw Open. 2025. PMID: 40434777 Free PMC article.
-
Accelerating clinical evidence synthesis with large language models.NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Aug 8;8(1):509. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01840-7. NPJ Digit Med. 2025. PMID: 40775042 Free PMC article.
-
Large Language Models in Medicine: Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.Int J Med Sci. 2025 May 31;22(11):2792-2801. doi: 10.7150/ijms.111780. eCollection 2025. Int J Med Sci. 2025. PMID: 40520893 Free PMC article. Review.
-
High-performance automated abstract screening with large language model ensembles.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 May 1;32(5):893-904. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf050. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025. PMID: 40119675 Free PMC article.
-
GPT-3.5 Turbo and GPT-4 Turbo in Title and Abstract Screening for Systematic Reviews.JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Mar 12;13:e64682. doi: 10.2196/64682. JMIR Med Inform. 2025. PMID: 40073422 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jahan N, Naveed S, Zeshan M, Tahir MA. How to conduct a systematic review: a narrative literature review. Cureus. 2016 Nov 04;8(11):e864. doi: 10.7759/cureus.864. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/27924252 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Institute of Medicine. Board on Health Care Services. Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines. Graham R, Mancher M, Miller Wolman D, Greenfield S, Steinberg E. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011. - PubMed
-
- Geyskens I, Krishnan R, Steenkamp JEM, Cunha PV. A review and evaluation of meta-analysis practices in management research. J Management. 2008 Feb 05;35(2):393–419. doi: 10.1177/0149206308328501. - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources