Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 1;17(8):349-353.
doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0107.

Multiyear Clinical Outcomes of Cancers Diagnosed Following Detection by a Blood-Based Multicancer Early Detection Test

Affiliations

Multiyear Clinical Outcomes of Cancers Diagnosed Following Detection by a Blood-Based Multicancer Early Detection Test

Adam H Buchanan et al. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). .

Abstract

In the US, <20% of cancers are diagnosed by standard-of-care (SoC) screening. Multicancer early detection (MCED) tests offer the opportunity to expand cancer screening. Understanding the characteristics and clinical outcomes of MCED-detected cancers is critical to clarifying MCED tests' potential impact. DETECT-A is the first prospective interventional trial of an MCED blood test (CancerSEEK). CancerSEEK, coupled with diagnostic PET-CT, identified cancers including those not detected by SoC screening, the majority of which were localized or regional. We report multiyear outcomes in patients with cancers diagnosed following a positive CancerSEEK test. Nine cancer types were diagnosed in 26 participants whose cancers were first detected by CancerSEEK. Information on cancer diagnoses, treatments, and clinical outcomes was extracted from medical records through November 2022. Data collection occurred at a median of 4.4 years (IQR: 4.1-4.6) following study enrollment. Thirteen of 26 (50%) participants were alive and cancer-free [ovarian (4), thyroid (1), uterine (2), breast (1), colorectal (2), and lung (3)]; 7/13 (54%) had cancers without recommended SoC screening modalities. All eight treated stage I or II participants (8/8, 100%) and 12/14 (86%) surgically treated participants were alive and cancer-free. Eligibility for surgical treatment was associated with favorable multiyear outcomes (P = 0.0002). Half of participants with MCED-detected cancers were alive and cancer-free after 4.4 years median follow-up. Most were diagnosed with early-stage cancers and were treated surgically. These results suggest that early cancer detection by CancerSEEK may have facilitated curative-intent treatments and associated positive clinical outcomes in some DETECT-A participants. Prevention Relevance: This study provides preliminary evidence of the potential of multicancer early detection testing as an effective screening tool for detecting cancers without standard-of-care (SoC) screening modalities and complementing SoC cancer screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A.H. Buchanan reports grants from Exact Sciences during the conduct of the study; grants from Freenome Holdings, Inc. outside the submitted work; and equity stake in MeTree and You, Inc. A.M. Lennon reports other support from Exact Science during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Exact Science outside the submitted work; in addition, A.M. Lennon has a patent for CancerSEEK licensed and with royalties paid from Exact Science. O.A. Choudhry reports employment and stock ownership at Exact Sciences Corporation. P.Z. Elias reports employment and stock ownership at Exact Sciences Corporation. S.P. Rego reports employment and stock ownership at Exact Sciences Corporation. J.R. Sadler reports employment and stock ownership at Exact Sciences Corporation. J. Roberta reports employment and stock ownership at Exact Sciences Corporation. Y. Zhang reports Y. Zhang reports employment and stock ownership at Exact Sciences Corporation. D.D. Flake II reports employment and stock ownership at Exact Sciences Corporation. Z.M. Salvati reports grants from Exact Sciences during the conduct of the study. E.S. Wagner reports grants from Exact Sciences Corporation during the conduct of the study; grants from Freenome Holdings, Inc. outside the submitted work. E.K. Fishman reports other support from Exact Science during the conduct of the study. N. Papadopoulos reports other support from Thrive/EXACT Sciences, Personal Genome Diagnostics, NeoPhore, CAGE Pharma, ManaTbio, Receive royalties from licensings, and Haystack/Quest during the conduct of the study; in addition, N. Papadopoulos has a patent for PCT/US2018/045669 with royalties paid from EXACT. T.M. Beer reports employment and stock ownership at Exact Sciences Corporation; grants from Delfi, Adela, Freenome, and Grail outside the submitted work.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. US Preventive Services Task Force; Curry SJ, Krist AH, Owens DK, Barry MJ, Caughey AB, Davidson KW, et al. . Screening for cervical cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA 2018;320:674–86. - PubMed
    1. US Preventive Services Task Force; Davidson KW, Barry MJ, Mangione CM, Cabana M, Caughey AB, Davis EM, et al. . Screening for colorectal cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA 2021;325:1965–77. - PubMed
    1. Potter AL, Bajaj SS, Yang CFJ. The 2021 USPSTF lung cancer screening guidelines: a new frontier. Lancet Respir Med 2021;9:689–91. - PubMed
    1. Siu AL; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force . Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2016;164:279–96. - PubMed
    1. Smith RA, Andrews KS, Brooks D, Fedewa SA, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Saslow D, et al. . Cancer screening in the United States, 2019: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin 2019;69:184–210. - PubMed