Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 31:26:e49383.
doi: 10.2196/49383.

Examining the Role of Information Behavior in Linking Cancer Risk Perception and Cancer Worry to Cancer Fatalism in China: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

Affiliations

Examining the Role of Information Behavior in Linking Cancer Risk Perception and Cancer Worry to Cancer Fatalism in China: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

Lianshan Zhang et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Reducing cancer fatalism is essential because of its detrimental impact on cancer-related preventive behaviors. However, little is known about factors influencing individuals' cancer fatalism in China.

Objective: With a general basis of the extended parallel process model, this study aims to examine how distinct cancer-related mental conditions (risk perception and worry) and different information behaviors (information seeking vs avoidance) become associated with cancer fatalism, with an additional assessment of the moderating effect of information usefulness.

Methods: Data were drawn from the Health Information National Trends Survey in China, which was conducted in 2017 (N=2358). Structural equation modeling and bootstrapping methods were performed to test a moderated mediation model and hypothesized relationships.

Results: The results showed that cancer risk perception and cancer worry were positively associated with online health information seeking. In addition, cancer worry was positively related to cancer information avoidance. Moreover, online health information seeking was found to reduce cancer fatalism, while cancer information avoidance was positively associated with cancer fatalism. The results also indicated that the perceived usefulness of cancer information moderated this dual-mediation pathway.

Conclusions: The national survey data indicate that cancer mental conditions should not be treated as homogeneous entities, given their varying functions and effects. Apart from disseminating useful cancer information to encourage individuals to adaptively cope with cancer threats, we advocate for health communication programs to reduce cancer information avoidance to alleviate fatalistic beliefs about cancer prevention.

Keywords: cancer fatalism; cancer risk perception; cancer worry; health information seeking; information avoidance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Hypothesized model.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Final model with standardized path coefficients. Dotted lines indicate nonsignificant relationships. The covariances between all exogenous factors (eg, controls) and coefficients with control variables are not presented for the purpose of clarity. *P<.05, **P<.01, ***P<.001.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Moderating effect of perceived usefulness of online cancer information on the relationship between cancer risk perception and online health information seeking; the higher value is 1 SD above the mean, and the lower value is 1 SD below the mean.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Moderating effect of perceived usefulness of online cancer information on the relationship between cancer worry and online health information seeking; the higher value is 1 SD above the mean, and the lower value is 1 SD below the mean.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Moderating effect of perceived usefulness of online cancer information on the relationship between cancer worry and cancer information avoidance; the higher value is 1 SD above the mean, and the lower value is 1 SD below the mean.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Xia C, Dong X, Li H, Cao M, Sun D, He S, Yang F, Yan X, Zhang S, Li N, Chen W. Cancer statistics in China and United States, 2022: profiles, trends, and determinants. Chin Med J (Engl) 2022 Feb 09;135(5):584–90. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002108. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/35143424 00029330-202203050-00011 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Soerjomataram I, Bray F. Planning for tomorrow: global cancer incidence and the role of prevention 2020-2070. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021 Oct;18(10):663–72. doi: 10.1038/s41571-021-00514-z.10.1038/s41571-021-00514-z - DOI - PubMed
    1. Niederdeppe J, Fowler EF, Goldstein K, Pribble J. Does local television news coverage cultivate fatalistic beliefs about cancer prevention? J Commun. 2010 Jun 01;60(2):230–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01474.x. http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79095 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Powe BD, Finnie R. Cancer fatalism: the state of the science. Cancer Nurs. 2003 Dec;26(6):454–65; quiz 466-7. doi: 10.1097/00002820-200312000-00005. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types