Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 31;19(5):e0304509.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304509. eCollection 2024.

Application of a transparent artificial intelligence algorithm for US adults in the obese category of weight

Affiliations

Application of a transparent artificial intelligence algorithm for US adults in the obese category of weight

Alexander A Huang et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objective and aims: Identification of associations between the obese category of weight in the general US population will continue to advance our understanding of the condition and allow clinicians, providers, communities, families, and individuals make more informed decisions. This study aims to improve the prediction of the obese category of weight and investigate its relationships with factors, ultimately contributing to healthier lifestyle choices and timely management of obesity.

Methods: Questionnaires that included demographic, dietary, exercise and health information from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2017-2020) were utilized with BMI 30 or higher defined as obesity. A machine learning model, XGBoost predicted the obese category of weight and Shapely Additive Explanations (SHAP) visualized the various covariates and their feature importance. Model statistics including Area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and feature properties such as gain, cover, and frequency were measured. SHAP explanations were created for transparent and interpretable analysis.

Results: There were 6,146 adults (age > 18) that were included in the study with average age 58.39 (SD = 12.94) and 3122 (51%) females. The machine learning model had an Area under the receiver operator curve of 0.8295. The top four covariates include waist circumference (gain = 0.185), GGT (gain = 0.101), platelet count (gain = 0.059), AST (gain = 0.057), weight (gain = 0.049), HDL cholesterol (gain = 0.032), and ferritin (gain = 0.034).

Conclusion: In conclusion, the utilization of machine learning models proves to be highly effective in accurately predicting the obese category of weight. By considering various factors such as demographic information, laboratory results, physical examination findings, and lifestyle factors, these models successfully identify crucial risk factors associated with the obese category of weight.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Receiver operator characteristic curve and model statistics.
The Receiver operating characteristic curve for the machine-learning model predicting whether the patient were in the obese category of weight. AUROC = 0.8295 (P<0.0001).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Overall SHAP explanations.
SHAP explanations, purple color representing higher values of the covariate while yellow representing lower values of the covariate. X-axis is the change in log-odds for advanced the obese category of weight.
Fig 3
Fig 3. SHAP explanations, covariate value on the x-axis, change in log-odds on the y-axis, red line represents the relationship between the covariate and log-odds for being in the obese category of weight, each black dot represents an observation.
Covariates: top left–HS C-Reactive Protein (mg/mL), top right–Insulin (uU/mL), bottom left–Blood lead (ug/dL), bottom right–Blood cadmium (ug/L).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Koh HE, Cao C, Mittendorfer B. Insulin Clearance in Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(2). Epub 20220106. doi: 10.3390/ijms23020596 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8776220. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cleveland LP, Grummon AH, Konieczynski E, Mancini S, Rao A, Simon D, et al.. Obesity prevention across the US: A review of state-level policies from 2009 to 2019. Obes Sci Pract. 2023;9(2):95–102. Epub 20220615. doi: 10.1002/osp4.621 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10073818. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jokela M, Laakasuo M. Obesity as a causal risk factor for depression: Systematic review and meta-analysis of Mendelian Randomization studies and implications for population mental health. J Psychiatr Res. 2023;163:86–92. Epub 20230504. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.05.034 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jordan K, Fawsitt CG, Carty PG, Clyne B, Teljeur C, Harrington P, et al.. Cost-effectiveness of metabolic surgery for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity: a systematic review of economic evaluations. Eur J Health Econ. 2023;24(4):575–90. Epub 20220722. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01494-2 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10175448. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huang AA, Huang SY. Use of machine learning to identify risk factors for insomnia. PLoS One. 2023;18(4):e0282622. Epub 20230412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282622 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10096447. - DOI - PMC - PubMed