Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 31;19(5):e0301828.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301828. eCollection 2024.

Trade shocks and trade diversion due to epidemic diseases: Evidence from 110 countries

Affiliations

Trade shocks and trade diversion due to epidemic diseases: Evidence from 110 countries

Naixi Liu et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

COVID-19 has been a massive trade shock that has disrupted global trade, making the last few years a special phase. Even during normal times, epidemic diseases have acted as trade shocks in specific countries, albeit not to the same extent as COVID-19. For some trade shocks, the situation normalizes after the disease transmission is over; for some, it does not. Thus, specific countries can sometimes lose their original trade ratio due to trade diversion; that is, an epidemic disease could lead to unexpected industry restructuring. To examine this, based on data on 110 WHO members from 1996 to 2018, we use a fixed-effect panel model supported by the Hausman Test to empirically identify whether epidemic diseases can cause trade shocks and trade diversion. We find: First, epidemic disease can lead to negative shocks to a country's trade growth and its ratio of worldwide trade. Second, with a longer epidemic, the probability of the trade diversion effect increases. Our results hold even after considering country heterogeneity. This presents a considerable concern about the shock of COVID-19 lasting further. Many countries are not just facing the problem of temporary trade shocks, but also the challenge of trade diversions. In particular, the probability of trade diversions is increasing rapidly, especially for late-developed countries due to their lack of epidemic containment and vaccine-producing capabilities. Even middle and high income countries cannot ignore global industry chain restructuring. Forward-looking policies should be implemented in advance; it may be too late when long-term trade damage is shown.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Logical diagram of the impact of the disease on trade.
Note: Arrows indicate the transmission mechanism of the impact of epidemic diseases on trade shocks and diversion.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fernandes Ana and Tang Heiwai, How Did the 2003 SARS Epidemic Shape Chinese Trade? May 15, 2020, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3603699
    1. Yu Zhen, Xiao Yao, and Li Yuankun. The response of the labor force participation rate to an epidemic: Evidence from a cross-country analysis. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2020, 56(10): 2390–2407.
    1. Dai Chenghao. The impact of the epidemic on the economy—an analysis from the perspective of unemployment rate and household consumption. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 2022, 2: 81–94.
    1. Gruszczynski Lukasz. The COVID-19 pandemic and international trade: Temporary turbulence or paradigm shift?. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 2020, 11(2): 337–342.
    1. Arnon Alexander, Ricco John, and Smetters Kent. Epidemiological and economic effects of lockdown. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2020, 2020(3): 61–108.