Trade shocks and trade diversion due to epidemic diseases: Evidence from 110 countries
- PMID: 38820356
- PMCID: PMC11142499
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301828
Trade shocks and trade diversion due to epidemic diseases: Evidence from 110 countries
Abstract
COVID-19 has been a massive trade shock that has disrupted global trade, making the last few years a special phase. Even during normal times, epidemic diseases have acted as trade shocks in specific countries, albeit not to the same extent as COVID-19. For some trade shocks, the situation normalizes after the disease transmission is over; for some, it does not. Thus, specific countries can sometimes lose their original trade ratio due to trade diversion; that is, an epidemic disease could lead to unexpected industry restructuring. To examine this, based on data on 110 WHO members from 1996 to 2018, we use a fixed-effect panel model supported by the Hausman Test to empirically identify whether epidemic diseases can cause trade shocks and trade diversion. We find: First, epidemic disease can lead to negative shocks to a country's trade growth and its ratio of worldwide trade. Second, with a longer epidemic, the probability of the trade diversion effect increases. Our results hold even after considering country heterogeneity. This presents a considerable concern about the shock of COVID-19 lasting further. Many countries are not just facing the problem of temporary trade shocks, but also the challenge of trade diversions. In particular, the probability of trade diversions is increasing rapidly, especially for late-developed countries due to their lack of epidemic containment and vaccine-producing capabilities. Even middle and high income countries cannot ignore global industry chain restructuring. Forward-looking policies should be implemented in advance; it may be too late when long-term trade damage is shown.
Copyright: © 2024 Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effects of COVID-19 on trade flows: Measuring their impact through government policy responses.PLoS One. 2021 Oct 13;16(10):e0258356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258356. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34644312 Free PMC article.
-
International travel-related control measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 25;3(3):CD013717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013717.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 33763851 Free PMC article.
-
SARS-CoV-2 Wave Two Surveillance in East Asia and the Pacific: Longitudinal Trend Analysis.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 1;23(2):e25454. doi: 10.2196/25454. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 33464207 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19, trade collapse and GVC linkages: European experience.World Econ. 2022 Jul 11:10.1111/twec.13314. doi: 10.1111/twec.13314. Online ahead of print. World Econ. 2022. PMID: 35942037 Free PMC article.
-
Travel-related control measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 5;10:CD013717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013717. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 25;3:CD013717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013717.pub2. PMID: 33502002 Updated.
Cited by
-
Climate change, geography and trade agreements: A perspective of Asian bilateral trade.PLoS One. 2025 Apr 25;20(4):e0320363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320363. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40279357 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fernandes Ana and Tang Heiwai, How Did the 2003 SARS Epidemic Shape Chinese Trade? May 15, 2020, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3603699
-
- Yu Zhen, Xiao Yao, and Li Yuankun. The response of the labor force participation rate to an epidemic: Evidence from a cross-country analysis. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2020, 56(10): 2390–2407.
-
- Dai Chenghao. The impact of the epidemic on the economy—an analysis from the perspective of unemployment rate and household consumption. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 2022, 2: 81–94.
-
- Gruszczynski Lukasz. The COVID-19 pandemic and international trade: Temporary turbulence or paradigm shift?. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 2020, 11(2): 337–342.
-
- Arnon Alexander, Ricco John, and Smetters Kent. Epidemiological and economic effects of lockdown. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2020, 2020(3): 61–108.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical