Cost-effectiveness analysis of soft bandage and immediate discharge versus rigid immobilization in children with distal radius torus fractures
- PMID: 38821496
- DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B6.BJJ-2023-1211.R1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of soft bandage and immediate discharge versus rigid immobilization in children with distal radius torus fractures
Abstract
Aims: The aim of this trial was to assess the cost-effectiveness of a soft bandage and immediate discharge, compared with rigid immobilization, in children aged four to 15 years with a torus fracture of the distal radius.
Methods: A within-trial economic evaluation was conducted from the UK NHS and personal social services (PSS) perspective, as well as a broader societal point of view. Health resources and quality of life (the youth version of the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-Y)) data were collected, as part of the Forearm Recovery in Children Evaluation (FORCE) multicentre randomized controlled trial over a six-week period, using trial case report forms and patient-completed questionnaires. Costs and health gains (quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)) were estimated for the two trial treatment groups. Regression was used to estimate the probability of the new treatment being cost-effective at a range of 'willingness-to-pay' thresholds, which reflect a range of costs per QALY at which governments are typically prepared to reimburse for treatment.
Results: The offer of a soft bandage significantly reduced cost per patient (saving £12.55 (95% confidence interval (CI) -£5.30 to £19.80)) while QALYs were similar (QALY difference between groups: 0.0013 (95% CI -0.0004 to 0.003)). The high probability (95%) that offering a bandage is a cost-effective option was consistent when examining the data in a range of sensitivity analyses.
Conclusion: In addition to the known clinical equivalence, this study found that the offer of a bandage reduced cost compared with rigid immobilization among children with a torus fracture of the distal radius. While the cost saving was small for each patient, the high frequency of these injuries indicates a significant saving across the healthcare system.
© 2024 Perry et al.
Conflict of interest statement
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (17/23/02). D. C. Perry was funded through an NIHR Clinician Scientist Fellowship (CS-2014–14–012) and latterly an NIHR Research Professorship. The trial was supported by the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. The University of Oxford acted as the study Sponsor. J. Achten and M. L. Costa's employer, The University of Oxford, receives research funding from the NIHR and Wellcome Trust for research into musculoskeletal trauma. S. Messahel holds a voluntary position as Secretary of the Executive Committee of Paediatric Emergency Research UK and Ireland Network.
References
-
- Baig MN . A review of epidemiological distribution of different types of fractures in paediatric age . Cureus . 2017 ; 9 ( 8 ): e1624 . 10.7759/cureus.1624 29098134
-
- Chung KC , Spilson SV . The frequency and epidemiology of hand and forearm fractures in the United States . J Hand Surg Am . 2001 ; 26 ( 5 ): 908 – 915 . 10.1053/jhsu.2001.26322 11561245
-
- Cooper C , Dennison EM , Leufkens HGM , Bishop N , van Staa TP . Epidemiology of childhood fractures in Britain: a study using the general practice research database . J Bone Miner Res . 2004 ; 19 ( 12 ): 1976 – 1981 . 10.1359/JBMR.040902 15537440
-
- Bergkvist A , Lundqvist E , Pantzar-Castilla E . Distal radius fractures in children aged 5-12 years: a Swedish nationwide register-based study of 25 777 patients . BMC Musculoskelet Disord . 2023 ; 24 ( 1 ): 560 . 10.1186/s12891-023-06680-8 37430230
-
- Charnley J . The Closed Treatment of Common Fractures . Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press , 2003 .
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical