Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 1;14(1):12586.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63229-y.

Validation of a polygenic risk score for frailty in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 and English longitudinal study of ageing

Affiliations

Validation of a polygenic risk score for frailty in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 and English longitudinal study of ageing

J P Flint et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Frailty is a complex trait. Twin studies and high-powered Genome Wide Association Studies conducted in the UK Biobank have demonstrated a strong genetic basis of frailty. The present study utilized summary statistics from a Genome Wide Association Study on the Frailty Index to create and test the predictive power of frailty polygenic risk scores (PRS) in two independent samples - the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 (LBC1936) and the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) aged 67-84 years. Multiple regression models were built to test the predictive power of frailty PRS at five time points. Frailty PRS significantly predicted frailty, measured via the FI, at all-time points in LBC1936 and ELSA, explaining 2.1% (β = 0.15, 95%CI, 0.085-0.21) and 1.8% (β = 0.14, 95%CI, 0.10-0.17) of the variance, respectively, at age ~ 68/ ~ 70 years (p < 0.001). This work demonstrates that frailty PRS can predict frailty in two independent cohorts, particularly at early ages (~ 68/ ~ 70). PRS have the potential to be valuable instruments for identifying those at risk for frailty and could be important for controlling for genetic confounders in epidemiological studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A bar plot comparing the standardized coefficients from the most predictive model at each time point in LBC1936 and ELSA. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. The darker the bar the stronger the effect size.

Update of

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Young ACM, Glaser K, Spector TD, Steves CJ. The identification of hereditary and environmental determinants of frailty in a Cohort of UK twins. Twin Res. Hum. Genet. 2016 doi: 10.1017/thg.2016.72. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stow D, Matthews FE, Hanratty B. Frailty trajectories to identify end of life: a longitudinal population-based study. BMC Med. 2018 doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1148-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gale CR, Cooper C, Aihie Sayer A. Prevalence of frailty and disability: findings from the English longitudinal study of ageing. Age Ageing. 2015 doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu148. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lazarus NR, Izquierdo M, Higginson IJ, Harridge SDR. Exercise deficiency diseases of ageing: the primacy of exercise and muscle strengthening as first-line therapeutic agents to combat frailty. J. Am. Med. Directors Assoc. 2018;19:741–743. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.04.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aguayo GA, et al. Agreement between 35 published frailty scores in the general population. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2017 doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx061. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types