Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2024 May 31;24(1):400.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06571-3.

A comparison of childbirth self-efficacy, fear of childbirth, and labor pain intensity between primiparas and multiparas during the latent phase of labor: a cross-sectional study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A comparison of childbirth self-efficacy, fear of childbirth, and labor pain intensity between primiparas and multiparas during the latent phase of labor: a cross-sectional study

Yue Huang et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Childbirth is a long-lasting physiological stress. As one of the main stressors, labor pain exists throughout the whole process. Childbirth self-efficacy is the confidence, or belief that they can manage pain during childbirth. This sense of self-efficacy determines how pregnant women deal with labor pain and enables them to regulate their behavior and actively deal with childbirth. However, the difference in pain sensitivity between single births (primiparas) and multiple births (multiparas) has rarely been investigated.

Objectives: This study is aimed at investigating self-efficacy, fear of childbirth, labor pain of primiparas and multiparas and exploring factors related to the perceived labor pain intensity of pregnant women.

Design: Prospective cross-sectional study.

Setting(s): Labour and delivery in a large academic specialized hospital in Guangzhou, China.

Participants: A total of 347 women, (182 primiparas and 165 multiparas) were enrolled in the data analysis. Pain was assessed before cervical dilatation (cervical dilatation ≤ 3 cm for the first delivery and ≤ 2 cm for the second delivery).

Method: The general information of participants was obtained by questionnaire and obstetrical records of the subjects were obtained from the electronic medical records extracted from the electronic medical record system (EMRS). Childbirth self-efficacy, fear of childbirth (FOC) and labor pain were compared between primiparas and multiparas. Paired t-test, chi-square test, Mann-Whitney test, univariate and multivariate regression analysis were used to analyze labor pain between the two groups and investigate factors related perceived labor pain intensity.

Results: The total scores related to fear of childbirth, fetal health, self-control, and labor pain injury of multiparas were notably reduced compared with primiparas (all P < 0.05). The perceived labor pain intensity and duration of the first stage of labor was reduced in the multipara group compared with the primipara group. The childbirth control sense of the multipara was better than that of the primipara. The perceived labor pain intensity was negatively correlated with advanced age (age ≥ 35 years), self-efficacy score, family support, and education (all P < 0.05). In contrast, the perceived labor pain intensity was positively correlated with tension, severe fear of childbirth, and anxiety (P < 0.05). Self-efficacy, gravidity, delivery cognition, and fear of childbirth were independent risk factors for the perceived labor pain intensity in the latent period (all P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Fear of childbirth is a predictor of perceived labor pain intensity. The extent of labor pain (minimum and maximum) can be predicted by the level of fear the expectant mother has. During the latent phase of labor, self-efficacy, fear of childbirth and labor pain are different between primiparas and multiparas.

Keywords: A cross-sectional study; Childbirth self-efficacy; Fear of childbirth; Labor pain; Multipara; Primipara.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Carlhäll S, Nelson M, Svenvik M, Axelsson D, Blomberg M. Maternal childbirth experience and time in labor: a population-based cohort study. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):11930. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14711-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hulsbosch LP, Nyklíček I, Potharst ES, Boekhorst MG, Pop VJ. Development of the Labor Pain Relief attitude questionnaire for pregnant women (LPRAQ-p) BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):718. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03415-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gido R, Yadeta TA, Tura AK. Utilization of Obstetric Analgesia for Labor Pain Management and Associated Factors among Obstetric Care Providers in Public Hospitals of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Obstet Gynecol Int 2021, 2021:9973001. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zha Y, Gong X, Yang C, Deng D, Feng L, Luo A, Wan L, Qiao F, Zeng W, Chen S, et al. Epidural analgesia during labor and its optimal initiation time-points: a real-world study on 400 Chinese nulliparas. Med (Baltim) 2021;100(9):e24923. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024923. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deepak D, Kumari A, Mohanty R, Prakash J, Kumar T, Priye S. Effects of Epidural Analgesia on Labor Pain and Course of Labor in Primigravid parturients: a prospective non-randomized comparative study. Cureus. 2022;14(6):e26090. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types