Effect of cervical Bishop score on induction of labor at term in primiparas using Foley catheter balloon: a retrospective study
- PMID: 38822253
- PMCID: PMC11143649
- DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06600-1
Effect of cervical Bishop score on induction of labor at term in primiparas using Foley catheter balloon: a retrospective study
Abstract
Background: Previous studies had found that the mechanical methods were as effective as pharmacological methods in achieving vaginal delivery. However, whether balloon catheter induction is suitable for women with severe cervical immaturity and whether it will increase the related risks still need to be further explored.
Research aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter balloon for labor induction at term in primiparas with different cervical scores.
Methods: A total of 688 primiparas who received cervical ripening with a Foley catheter balloon were recruited in this study. They were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 (Bishop score ≤ 3) and Group 2 (3 < Bishop score < 7). Detailed medical data before and after using of balloon were faithfully recorded.
Results: The cervical Bishop scores of the two groups after catheter placement were all significantly higher than those before (Group 1: 5.49 ± 1.31 VS 2.83 ± 0.39, P<0.05; Group 2: 6.09 ± 1.00 VS 4.45 ± 0.59, P<0.05). The success rate of labor induction in group 2 was higher than that in group 1 (P<0.05). The incidence of intrauterine infection in Group 1 was higher than that in Group 2 (18.3% VS 11.3%, P<0.05).
Conclusion: The success rates of induction of labor by Foley catheter balloon were different in primiparas with different cervical conditions, the failure rate of induction of labor and the incidence of intrauterine infection were higher in primiparas with severe cervical immaturity.
Keywords: Bishop score; Cervical ripening; Foley catheter balloon; Induction of labor; Intrauterine infection.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
[Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter pre-induction of labor].Ginekol Pol. 2013 Mar;84(3):180-5. doi: 10.17772/gp/1560. Ginekol Pol. 2013. PMID: 23700844 Polish.
-
Six vs 12 hours of Foley catheter balloon placement in the labor induction of multiparas with unfavorable cervixes: a randomized controlled trial.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Nov;5(11):101142. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101142. Epub 2023 Aug 27. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023. PMID: 37643690 Clinical Trial.
-
Use of the Foley catheter versus a double balloon cervical ripening catheter in pre-induction cervical ripening in postdate primigravidae.J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016 Nov;42(11):1489-1494. doi: 10.1111/jog.13086. Epub 2016 Jul 19. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016. PMID: 27436681 Clinical Trial.
-
Single versus double-balloon catheters for the induction of labor of singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 May;297(5):1089-1100. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4713-9. Epub 2018 Feb 14. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018. PMID: 29445926
-
Intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus dinoprostone insert for induction cervical ripening: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(48):e13251. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013251. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. PMID: 30508911 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia Protocolo SEGO. De Induccion Del parto (updated July 2013) Prog Obstet Ginecol. 2015;58:54–64. doi: 10.1016/j.pog.2014.11.002. - DOI
-
- Jozwiak M, Bloemenkamp KW, Kelly AJ et al. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;14(3). - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources