Letter to the Editor re: "Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing Manta device and Perclose device for closure of large bore arterial access." J Vasc Access. 2024 Jan 8:11297298231222314
- PMID: 38822619
- PMCID: PMC12117126
- DOI: 10.1177/11297298241254255
Letter to the Editor re: "Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing Manta device and Perclose device for closure of large bore arterial access." J Vasc Access. 2024 Jan 8:11297298231222314
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures

References
-
- Schulz-Schüpke S, Helde S, Gewalt S, et al. Instrumental Sealing of Arterial Puncture Site- CLOSURE Device vs Manual Compression (ISAR-CLOSURE) Trial Investigators. Comparison of vascular closure devices vs manual compression after femoral artery puncture: the ISAR-CLOSURE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 312(19): 1981–1987. - PubMed
-
- Malkawi AH, Hinchliffe RJ, Holt PJ, et al.. Percutaneous access for endovascular aneurysm repair: a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010; 39(6): 676–682. - PubMed
-
- Van Mieghem NM, Latib A, van der Heyden J, et al.. Percutaneous plug-based arteriotomy closure device for large-bore access: a multicenter prospective study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017; 10(6): 613–619. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources