Prevalence of congenital anomalies and prenatal diagnosis by birth institution (public vs. non-public): indicators of inequality in access to elective termination of pregnancy for fetal anomalies
- PMID: 38822971
- PMCID: PMC11411032
- DOI: 10.1007/s12687-024-00714-x
Prevalence of congenital anomalies and prenatal diagnosis by birth institution (public vs. non-public): indicators of inequality in access to elective termination of pregnancy for fetal anomalies
Abstract
Congenital anomalies (CA) encompass all morphological or functional alterations originating prenatally and present at birth. The prenatal diagnosis of these anomalies can significantly impact the overall health of the pregnant individual and may influence her decision regarding the continuation of the pregnancy. In contexts where safe pregnancy termination is not guaranteed by the state, it can lead to unsafe procedures with severe consequences. In our research, we analyzed epidemiological information on CA to develop potential indicators of inequity in access to safe abortion prior to the legalization of legal termination of pregnancy in Argentina. We included cases from 13 public hospitals and 9 non-public subsector hospitals, from the period 2013-2020. Two groups of specific CA were selected: 1) CA capable of being prenatally diagnosed, and 2) CA related to vascular disruptive events. 10/18 of the selected CA capable of being prenatally diagnosed had a significantly higher prevalence in public hospitals (anencephaly, encephalocele, spina bifida, microcephaly, hydrocephalus, holoprosencephaly, hydranencephaly, diaphragmatic hernia, gastroschisis, bilateral renal agenesis). Non public hospitals had higher prenatal detection. Birth prevalence of CA related with vascular disruptive events (limb reduction, Moebius syndrome, amniotic band sequence) were significantly higher in public hospitals. These results suggest disparities in access to prenatal diagnosis and safe abortion based on socioeconomic status. There was a significant gap in access to prenatal diagnosis for CA and possibly to safe elective abortion depending on the type of institution (public vs. non-public).
Keywords: Congenital anomalies; Health inequities; Prenatal diagnosis; Unsafe abortion.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
[Prevalence of selected congenital anomalies in the Czech Republic: congenital anomalies of the central nervous system and gastrointestinal tract].Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 2015 Mar;64(1):47-53. Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 2015. PMID: 25872996 Czech.
-
Impact of prenatal diagnosis and elective termination on the prevalence of selected birth defects in Hawaii.Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Dec 15;148(12):1206-11. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009610. Am J Epidemiol. 1998. PMID: 9867267
-
Birth prevalence of congenital anomalies in Argentina, according to socioeconomic level.J Community Genet. 2021 Jul;12(3):345-355. doi: 10.1007/s12687-021-00516-5. Epub 2021 Mar 31. J Community Genet. 2021. PMID: 33786756 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of prenatally diagnosed structural congenital anomalies.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009 Sep;31(9):875-881. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34307-9. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009. PMID: 19941713 Review. English, French.
-
Ethical and legal dilemmas around termination of pregnancy for severe fetal anomalies: A review of two African neonates presenting with ventriculomegaly and holoprosencephaly.Niger J Clin Pract. 2015 Dec;18 Suppl:S31-9. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.170820. Niger J Clin Pract. 2015. PMID: 26620620 Review.
Cited by
-
Socioeconomic inequalities of pregnancy termination among reproductive age women in Bangladesh: a decomposition analysis using demographic and health survey.BMC Res Notes. 2024 Oct 14;17(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s13104-024-06935-0. BMC Res Notes. 2024. PMID: 39402658 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Baldacci S, Santoro M, Coi A, Mezzasalma L, Bianchi F, Pierini A (2020) Lifestyle and sociodemographic risk factors for gastroschisis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child 105(8):756–764 - PubMed
-
- Barbero P, Liascovich R, Tellechea AL, Piola A, Bidondo MP, Groisman B (2018) Inequidad en el diagnóstico prenatal y la interrupción del embarazo por anomalía fetal en Argentina. Arch Argent Pediatr 116(6):e813–e815
-
- Barbero P, Liascovich R, Valdez R, Moresco A (2011) Misoprostol teratogenicity: a prospective study in Argentina. Arch Argent Pediatría 109(3):226–231 - PubMed
-
- Bell C, Nevitt S, McKay VH, Fattah AY (2019) Will the real Moebius syndrome please stand up? A systematic review of the literature and statistical cluster analysis of clinical features. Am J Med Genet A 179(2):257–265 - PubMed
-
- Bidondo MP, Groisman B, Gili JA, Liascovich R, Barbero P, Pingray V (2015) Study on the prevalence and neonatal lethality in patients with selected congenital anomalies as per the data of the National Registry of Congenital Anomalies of Argentina. Arch Argent Pediatr 113(4):295–302 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous