Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep;17(3):745-755.
doi: 10.1007/s12194-024-00816-8. Epub 2024 Jun 1.

Analytical parameterization of Bragg curves for proton beams in muscle, bone, and polymethylmethacrylate

Behzad Aminafshar  1 , Hamid Reza Baghani  2 , Ali Asghar Mowlavi  1
Affiliations

Analytical parameterization of Bragg curves for proton beams in muscle, bone, and polymethylmethacrylate

Behzad Aminafshar et al. Radiol Phys Technol. 2024 Sep.

Erratum in

Abstract

Proton dose calculation in media other than water may be of interest for either research purposes or clinical practice. Current study aims to quantify the required parameters for analytical proton dosimetry in muscle, bone, and PMMA. Required analytical dosimetry parameters were extracted from ICRU-49 report and Janni study. Geant4 Toolkit was also used for Bragg curve simulation inside the investigated media at different proton energies. Calculated and simulated dosimetry data were compared using gamma analysis. Simulated and calculated Bragg curves are consistent, a fact that confirms the validity of reported parameters for analytical proton dosimetry inside considered media. Furthermore, derived analytical parameters for these media are different from those of water. Listed parameters can be reliably utilized for analytical proton dosimetry inside muscle, bone, and PMMA. Furthermore, accurate proton dosimetry inside each medium demands dedicated analytical parameters and one is not allowed to use the water coefficients for non-water media.

Keywords: Analytical approach; Depth dose distribution; Monte Carlo simulation; Non-water media; Proton beam.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baskar R, Lee KA, Yeo R, Yeoh KW. Cancer and radiation therapy: current advances and future directions. Int J Med Sci. 2012;9:193–9. - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Wang Y, Shen J, Gu P, Wang Z. Recent advances progress in radiotherapy for breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery: a review. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1–12.
    1. Nguyen ML, Cantrell JN, Ahmad S, Henson C. Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for the treatment of head and neck cancer: A dosimetric comparison. Med Dosim. 2021;46:259–63. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Samir F, Meaz TM, Hussiny FA, Ahmed AA, Mahmoud AA, Refaat T, et al. Analytical dosimetric study of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023;149(9):6239–46. - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Grimm A, Wollmann E, Sperk E, Weiß C, Sütterlin M, Berlit S, et al. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) of early breast cancer with low-energy x-rays in breast-conserving surgery. Strahlenther Onkol. 2023;200(4):296–305. - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources