Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 23:551:177-184.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.05.033. Epub 2024 May 31.

Dopamine D1 Receptor Agonists Rescue Age-related Decline in Temporal Order Memory

Affiliations

Dopamine D1 Receptor Agonists Rescue Age-related Decline in Temporal Order Memory

Luke Bransom et al. Neuroscience. .

Abstract

Dopamine D1 receptor agonists improve spatial working memory, but their effects on temporal order memory, particularly prone to the effects of aging, have not been studied. Two D1 agonists, PF6256142 (PF) and 2-methyldihydrexidine (2MDHX), were examined for their effects in a rodent temporal order recognition task. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that there is an age-related decline in rodent temporal order memory. The data also show that either agonist rescues the poor memory performance with a large effective size. Interestingly, the optimal effective dose varied among individual rats of different age groups. PF showed greater potency for older rats, whereas 2MDHX showed better overall population effectiveness. Both PF and 2MDHX have high intrinsic activity at rodent D1-mediated cAMP synthesis. Conversely, at D1-mediated β-arrestin recruitment, PF has essentially no intrinsic activity, whereas 2MDHX is a super-agonist. These findings suggest that D1 agonists have potential to treat age-related cognitive decline, and the pattern of functional selectivity may be useful for developing drugs with an improved therapeutic index.

Keywords: age-related cognitive decline; dopamine D1 agonist; functional selectivity/signaling bias; temporal order recognition; working memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest:

RBM is a consultant for Cerevel Therapeutics, and also is an inventor of D1-related technology. His conflicts of interests have been disclosed and are managed by the Pennsylvania State University.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Performance of TOR task by rats of three different age groups (youngest, middle, and oldest).
A: Task diagram. B: Individual performance distribution among each age group (violin bars). Horizontal lines show median; dots represent each individual rat; dash line indicates ITOR=0.7, which serves as the criteria to categorize “good (white) / bad (grey) performer”. C: Percentage of good/bad performers in each age group. Note the age-related decline in novelty seeking (good performer). * = p<0.05.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. Change in the TOR performance (ITOR) after D1 agonists 2MDHX or PF.
Each D1 agonist was administered at its respective individual optimal dose on three different age groups of rats. A: Comparison of the ITOR among vehicle and drugs. B: Comparison of the optimal dose among three age groups. Doses are log-transformed. Bars represent mean ± SD; dots and lines represent individual rats. * = p<0.05; *** = p<0.001. Note the significant changes in older rats and the lower optimal dose of PF needed for older rats.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:. Baseline TOR and effects of D1 agonists.
A: Change of ITOR for rats who performed better during baseline vehicle session vs rats who performed worse during baseline vehicle session. Dots and lines represent individual rats. White = good performers; gray = bad performers. B: Percentage of good performers whose ITOR was slightly increased (leftward line shadow) / decreased (vertical line shadow) after D1 agonist administration. C: Comparison of optimal dose for good vs bad performers. Doses are log-transformed. Bars represent mean ± SD; circles represent individual rats. * = p<0.05; **** = p<0.0001.

Similar articles

References

    1. Albasser MM, Amin E, Lin TC, Iordanova MD, Aggleton JP, 2012. Evidence that the rat hippocampus has contrasting roles in object recognition memory and object recency memory. Behav Neurosci 126(5), 659–669. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andersen PH, Jansen JA, 1990. Dopamine receptor agonists: selectivity and dopamine D1 receptor efficacy. European journal of pharmacology 188(6), 335–347. - PubMed
    1. Arnsten AF, Cai JX, Murphy BL, Goldman-Rakic PS, 1994. Dopamine D1 receptor mechanisms in the cognitive performance of young adult and aged monkeys. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 116(2), 143–151. - PubMed
    1. Arnsten AF, Girgis RR, Gray DL, Mailman RB, 2017. Novel Dopamine Therapeutics for Cognitive Deficits in Schizophrenia. Biological psychiatry 81(1), 67–77. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barker GR, Bird F, Alexander V, Warburton EC, 2007. Recognition memory for objects, place, and temporal order: a disconnection analysis of the role of the medial prefrontal cortex and perirhinal cortex. J Neurosci 27(11), 2948–2957. - PMC - PubMed