Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 Jul;40(5):e3826.
doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3826.

Time In Tight Range in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: A cross-sectional observational single centre study evaluating efficacy of new advanced technologies

Affiliations
Observational Study

Time In Tight Range in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: A cross-sectional observational single centre study evaluating efficacy of new advanced technologies

Riccardo Schiaffini et al. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: Early and tight glycaemic control is crucial to prevent long-term complications of Type 1 Diabetes (T1D). The aim of our study was to compare glucose metrics, including Time In Tight Range (TITR), in a real-world setting.

Methods: We performed a single-centre cross-sectional study in 534 children and adolescents with T1D. Participants were divided into four groups (multiple daily injections + real-time Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), multiple daily injections + intermittently scanned CGM, sensor augmented pump (SAP), and Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop (AHCL). Demographical and clinical data were collected and analysed.

Results: The group with AHCL showed significantly higher Time In Range (TIR) (71.31% ± 10.88) than SAP (57.82% ± 14.98; p < 0.001), MDI + rtCGM (54.56% ± 17.04; p < 0.001) and MDI + isCGM (52.17% ± 19.36; p < 0.001) groups with a lower Time Above Range (p < 0.001). The group with AHCL also showed lower Time Below Range than MDI + isCGM and SAP groups (p < 0.01). The overall TITR was 37% ± 14 with 19% of participants who reached a TITR ≥50% with a mean TIR of 81%. AHCL had significantly higher TITR (45.46% ± 11.77) than SAP (36.25% ± 13.53; p < 0.001), MDI + rtCGM (34.03% ± 13.89; p < 0.001) and MDI + isCGM (33.37% ± 15.84; p < 0.001) groups with a lower Coefficient of Variation (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Our study indicates that AHCL ensures a better glycaemic control with an improvement in both TIR and TITR, along with a reduction in CV. Implementation of automated insulin delivery systems should be considered in the treatment of children and adolescents with T1D.

Keywords: children; technologies; type 1 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. https://diabetesatlas.org/idfawp/resource‐files/2022/12/IDF‐T1D‐Index‐Re...
    1. Foster NC, Beck RW, Miller KM, et al. T1 Diabetes Exchange. State of type 1 diabetes management and outcomes from the T1D Exchange in 2016‐2018. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019;21(2):66‐72. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2018.0384
    1. Nathan DM, Bayless M, Cleary P, et al. DCCT/EDIC Research Group. Diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications study at 30 years: advances and contributions. Diabetes. 2013;62(12):3976‐3986. https://doi.org/10.2337/db13‐1093
    1. Gerstein HC, Ambrosius WT, Danis R, et al. ACCORD Study Group. Diabetic retinopathy, its progression, and incident cardiovascular events in the ACCORD trial. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(5):1266‐1271. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12‐1311
    1. Lachin JM, Bebu I, DCCT/EDIC Research Group. The beneficial effects of earlier versus later implementation of intensive therapy in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(10):2225‐2230. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21‐1331

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources