Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 28:18:1047-1058.
doi: 10.2147/PPA.S461027. eCollection 2024.

Exploring the Hidden Struggles: A Qualitative Insight into Urinary Incontinence Among Prostate Cancer Survivors Post-Surgery

Affiliations

Exploring the Hidden Struggles: A Qualitative Insight into Urinary Incontinence Among Prostate Cancer Survivors Post-Surgery

Na Sun et al. Patient Prefer Adherence. .

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore the experiences and challenges of prostate cancer patients suffering from urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy.

Methods: A descriptive qualitative research design was employed. Purposeful sampling was used to select 22 prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy and experienced urinary incontinence after surgery. These patients were interviewed between August to October 2023 at a tertiary B-grade hospital's pelvic floor center in Shanghai. The data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews and analyzed using content analysis to identify and refine themes.

Results: The experiences of urinary incontinence in patients can be categorized into four main themes: (1) Daily life disturbances (including 4 sub-themes: sleep disorders, fluid intake restriction, travel inconvenience, loss of sexual life); (2) Negative emotional experiences (including 4 sub-themes: perceived discrimination, concerns about recovery, loss of confidence in life, doubts about the surgical decision); (3) Social withdrawal (including 2 sub-themes: reduced desire for social interaction, decreased ability to socialize); (4) Limited support obtained (including 4 sub-themes: reliance on personal experience, seeking help from relatives and friends, difficulty discerning online information, lack of professional guidance).

Conclusion: Postoperative urinary incontinence in prostate cancer patients presents a multidimensional experience. Healthcare professionals need to pay attention to these patients' daily life, psychological state, and social interactions. Integrating various resources to provide professional support and rehabilitation guidance is crucial.

Keywords: patient experience; prostate cancer; qualitative research; radical prostatectomy; urinary incontinence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest in this work.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vernooij RW, Lancee M, Cleves A, Dahm P, Bangma CH, Aben KK. Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;6(6):Cd006590. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006590.pub3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Costello AJ. Considering the role of radical prostatectomy in 21st century prostate cancer care. Nat Rev Urol. 2020;17(3):177–188. doi:10.1038/s41585-020-0287-y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mazariego CG, Egger S, King MT, et al. Fifteen year quality of life outcomes in men with localised prostate cancer: population based Australian prospective study. BMJ. 2020;371:m3503. doi:10.1136/bmj.m3503 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sacco E, Prayer-Galetti T, Pinto F, et al. Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: incidence by definition, risk factors and temporal trend in a large series with a long-term follow-up. BJU Int. 2006;97(6):1234–1241. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06185.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Glazener C, Boachie C, Buckley B, et al. Urinary incontinence in men after formal one-to-one pelvic-floor muscle training following radical prostatectomy or transurethral resection of the prostate (MAPS): two parallel randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2011;378(9788):328–337. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60751-4 - DOI - PubMed