Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 27:17:2465-2474.
doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S459373. eCollection 2024.

Exploring the Application of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in the Diagnosis of Unexplained Pulmonary Infection

Affiliations

Exploring the Application of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in the Diagnosis of Unexplained Pulmonary Infection

Sida Chen et al. Int J Gen Med. .

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary infections are significant global health burdens, and conventional diagnostic methods (culture and polymerase chain reaction), are often limited by slow results and low sensitivity. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) offers a rapid, comprehensive alternative for identifying diverse pathogens, including rare and mixed infections. Thus, we assessed the diagnostic performance of mNGS in pulmonary infections, compared the findings with those of traditional pathogen detection methods, and explored its potential to enhance clinical diagnostics and patient care.

Methods: We collected samples from 125 immunocompromised patients diagnosed with pulmonary infection at the Department of Respiratory Medicine of Shenzhen Longgang Central Hospital from March 2020 to July 2022. We compared the rate of pathogen positivity and pathogen distribution between conventional pathogen detection methods and mNGS using samples including sputum, blood, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.

Results: Among the 125 cases of unexplained pulmonary infection, 82 (65.6%) and 40 (32.0%) tested positive for pathogens using mNGS and routine culture, respectively (P < 0.05). Both methods of pathogen detection were positive in 28 (22.4%) cases (complete match, 9; complete mismatch, 13; partial match, 6). However, 43.2% of cases only tested positive using mNGS, 9.4% only tested positive using routine tests, and 24.8% tested negative using both methods. A viral infection was present in 55.2% of cases. The detection rate of mycobacteria using mNGS (12.8%) was higher than that using conventional pathogen detection methods (5.6%).

Conclusion: mNGS technology enhances pathogen detection in unexplained pulmonary infections, enabling targeted antimicrobial therapy and consequently helping to reduce broad-spectrum antibiotic use, aligning treatments more closely with the causative pathogens. Thus, mNGS offers significant clinical value by improving treatment efficacy and potentially reducing antibiotic resistance in pulmonary infection cases.

Keywords: BALF; Pathogens; Unexplained pulmonary infection; mNGS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of patient selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Detection of pathogens using mNGS and CMTs. (A) Positive mNGS and culture results in 125 patients with pulmonary infection. (B) mNGS and traditional culture methods were positive for 82 and 40 patients, respectively. Among them, 28 cases were positive for both methods, 9 (7%) of which were completely matched.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Spectrum of pathogens detected by mNGS. (A) Distribution of the top 30 pathogens detected in the 125 cases of unexplained pulmonary infection. (B) Distribution of the top 30 pathogens detected in the 18 cases of mixed infection.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Proportion of the top 20 most abundant bacteria identified by mNGS at the genus level.

Similar articles

References

    1. Sun Y, Li H, Pei Z, et al. Incidence of community-acquired pneumonia in urban China: a national population-based study. Vaccine. 2020;38(52):8362–8370. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.11.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhu YG, Tang XD, Lu YT, Zhang J, Qu JM. Contemporary situation of community-acquired pneumonia in China: a systematic review. J Transl Int Med. 2018;6(1):26–31. doi:10.2478/jtim-2018-0006 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jiang N, Li R, Bao J, et al. Incidence and disease burden of community-acquired pneumonia in southeastern China: data from integrated medical resources. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021;17(12):5638–5645. doi:10.1080/21645515.2021.1996151 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hardak E, Avivi I, Berkun L, et al. Polymicrobial pulmonary infection in patients with hematological malignancies: prevalence, co-pathogens, course and outcome. Infection. 2016;44(4):491–497. doi:10.1007/s15010-016-0873-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Loeffelholz M, Chonmaitree T. Advances in diagnosis of respiratory virus infections. Int J Microbiol. 2010;2010:126049. doi:10.1155/2010/126049 - DOI - PMC - PubMed