The Accuracy of Cup Placement in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Using an Augmented Reality-Based Navigation System
- PMID: 38826595
 - PMCID: PMC11140827
 - DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59423
 
The Accuracy of Cup Placement in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Using an Augmented Reality-Based Navigation System
Abstract
Background AR HIP Navigation System® (AR-navi; Zimmer-Biomet, Warsaw, IN) is a portable navigation system employing augmented reality via a smartphone app, which was developed in Japan. We retrospectively analyzed the accuracy of cup placement in total hip arthroplasty (THA) using AR-navi, to investigate whether obesity is associated with an absolute value error in cup placement angle. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 45 hips in 43 patients who underwent THA using AR-navi (AR-navi group) and compared them with 45 hips in 45 patients who underwent THA using alignment rods (conventional group). Results The mean absolute error of cup placement (AR-navi group vs. conventional group) was found to be 2.60° (±2.11) in radiographic inclination (RI) for the AR-navi group and 4.61° (±3.28) for the conventional group, which indicates significant difference in the AR-navi group compared to that in the conventional group (p = 0.0036). The mean absolute error of radiographic anteversion (RA) was 3.57° (±3.36) for the AR-navi group and 3.87° (±2.97) for the conventional group (p = 0.4732). The mean absolute error of RI was 2.36° (±2.24) in the obese group and 3.16° (±2.03) in the nonobese group, and the mean absolute error of RA was 4.08° (±4.51) and 3.16° (±2.05) in the obese and nonobese groups, respectively. Conclusions Cup placement accuracy for THA using AR-navi was 2.60 ± 2.11° for RI and 3.87 ± 2.97° for RA. Compared to THA using the conventional method, the RI installation error was significantly improved with AR Navi. There was no significant difference in the mean absolute error of RI and RA among the obese and nonobese groups.
Keywords: augmented reality; cup placement accuracy; navigation system; obesity; total hip arthroplasty.
Copyright © 2024, Shimizu et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
              
              
              
              
                
                
                References
- 
    
- Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. https://journals.lww.com/jbjsjournal/abstract/1978/60020/Dislocations_af.... J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:217–220. - PubMed
 
 - 
    
- Acetabular component orientation in 834 total hip arthroplasties using a manual technique. Minoda Y, Kadowaki T, Kim M. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;445:186–191. - PubMed
 
 - 
    
- The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. D'Lima DD, Urquhart AG, Buehler KO, Walker RH, Colwell CW Jr. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:315–321. - PubMed
 
 - 
    
- Accuracy of angle and position of the cup using computed tomography-based navigation systems in total hip arthroplasty. Iwana D, Nakamura N, Miki H, Kitada M, Hananouchi T, Sugano N. Comput Aided Surg. 2013;18:187–194. - PubMed
 
 
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials