Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 27:8:txae084.
doi: 10.1093/tas/txae084. eCollection 2024.

Effect of acidosis in the late-finishing phase on rumen fermentation in feedlot steers

Affiliations

Effect of acidosis in the late-finishing phase on rumen fermentation in feedlot steers

Haley F Linder et al. Transl Anim Sci. .

Abstract

The objective was to determine the effects of induced acidosis in the late-finishing phase on rumen fermentation in feedlot steers. Eleven ruminally cannulated steers (body weight [BW] = 795 kg ± 54) were blocked into two groups based on initial BW. For 195 d prior to the start of the study, cattle were consuming a basal finishing diet (60% dry-rolled corn, 15% modified distillers grains, 15% corn silage, and 10% ground corn-based supplement). Steers were randomly assigned to one of the two treatments: control (CON), or induced acidosis (ACD). Both treatments were fasted for 24 h then fed the basal finishing diet. Steers on the ACD treatment received 0.05% of BW of wheat starch via rumen cannula at 0800 and 2000 hours on day 1 and ad libitum refeeding following the fast. On days 1 and 2, CON steers were provided 25% of allotted feed every 6 h. Rumen fluid was collected every 4 h during the challenge period (hours 0 to 48), and 0, 6, and 12 h after feeding during the recovery period (hours 54 to 96). Rumen fluid was analyzed for pH, ammonia, volatile fatty acids (VFA), and lactate. Fecal grab samples were collected every 8 h to determine fecal pH. A treatment × day interaction (P = 0.03) was observed for dry matter intake during the challenge period with steers on the ACD treatments consuming more on day 1 than CON steers. Intake was not different on day 2 (P = 0.88). A treatment × hour effect (P < 0.01) was observed for ruminal pH during the challenge period with the ACD steers having a lesser pH than CON from hours 12 to 32. Duration of time below a pH of 5.6 during the challenge period was greater (P < 0.01) for ACD steers than CON. During the challenge period, a treatment × time interaction (P = 0.04) was observed for total VFA concentration with ACD steers having greater total VFA concentration from hours 12 to 36. Acetate to propionate ratio (A:P) was affected by treatment × hour (P = 0.04) with CON steers having greater A:P from hours 28 to 48. Rumen ammonia and lactate concentrations did not differ (P ≥ 0.25) between treatments or the interaction with time. Challenge and recovery period fecal pH were not affected (P ≥ 0.13) by treatment, time, or their interaction. Recovery period ruminal pH was not different (P = 0.99) between treatments. For the recovery period, total VFA and ammonia concentration were not affected by treatment, time, or their interaction (P ≥ 0.07). Ruminal pH and VFA were affected in the initial 48 h of induced acidosis in the late-finishing phase.

Keywords: acidosis; feedlot; late-finishing phase.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no real or perceived conflict of interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Effect of induced acidosis in the late-finishing phase on rumen pH (A), total volatile fatty acids concentration (B), and acetate:propionate (A:P) ratio (C). Treatments consisted of CON (control) or ACD (induced acidosis). X-axis refers to the hour of the experiment. All variables were affected by treatment × time (P < 0.01). Pairwise treatment differences were sliced by time and indicated by * when P ≤ 0.05.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Effect of induced acidosis in the late-finishing phase on acetate molar proportion (A), propionate molar proportion (B), and butyrate molar proportion (C). Treatments consisted of CON (control) or ACD (induced acidosis). X-axis refers to the hour of the experiment. Acetate and propionate were affected by treatment × time (P < 0.01). Butyrate tended to be affected by hour (P = 0.09). For treatment × time interactions, pairwise treatment differences were sliced by time and indicated by * when P ≤ 0.05.

References

    1. Allen, M. S. 1997. Relationship between fermentation acid production in the rumen and the requirement for physically effective fiber. J. Dairy Sci. 80:1447–1462. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76074-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andries, J. I., Buysse F. X., De Brabander D. L., and Cottyn B. G... 1987. Isoacids in ruminant nutrition: Their role in ruminal and intermediary metabolism and possible influences on performances — a review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 18:169–180. doi: 10.1016/0377-8401(87)90069-1 - DOI
    1. Bevans, D. W., Beauchemin K. A., Schwartzkopf-Genswein K. S., McKinnon J. J., and McAllister T. A... 2005. Effect of rapid or gradual grain adaptation on subacute acidosis and feed intake by feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 83:1116–1132. doi: 10.2527/2005.8351116x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blanch, M., Calsamiglia S., DiLorenzo N., DiCostanzo A., Muetzel S., and Wallace R. J... 2009. Physiological changes in rumen fermentation during acidosis induction and its control using a multivalent polyclonal antibody preparation in heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 87:1722–1730. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1184 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blum, J. W., Kunz P., Bachmann C., and Colombo J. P.. 1981. Metabolic effects of fasting in steers. Res. J. Vet. Sci. 31:127–129. doi: 10.1016/S0034-5288(18)32536-0 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources