Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023:2:5.
doi: 10.12688/molpsychol.17539.1. Epub 2023 May 4.

What do mammals have to say about the neurobiology of acoustic communication?

Affiliations

What do mammals have to say about the neurobiology of acoustic communication?

Angeles Salles et al. Mol Psychol. 2023.

Abstract

Auditory communication is crucial across taxa, including humans, because it enables individuals to convey information about threats, food sources, mating opportunities, and other social cues necessary for survival. Comparative approaches to auditory communication will help bridge gaps across taxa and facilitate our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying this complex task. In this work, we briefly review the field of auditory communication processing and the classical champion animal, the songbird. In addition, we discuss other mammalian species that are advancing the field. In particular, we emphasize mice and bats, highlighting the characteristics that may inform how we think about communication processing.

Keywords: auditory processing; comparative models; social communication; vocal production; vocalizations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Graphical abstract of the proposed advantages of comparative work in the field of neural circuits mediating mammalian social communication.
We define sophisticated techniques as chemogenetics, intersectional genetics, single-cell resolution connectomics, spatial transcriptomics, and computational approaches that will help bridge system neuroscience and neuroethology.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Diagram showing proposed circuitry underlying vocal production in mammals.

Similar articles

References

    1. Saito N, Maekawa M: Birdsong: the interface with human language. Brain Dev. 1993; 15(1): 31–39. - PubMed
    1. Aamodt CM, Farias-Virgens M, White SA: Birdsong as a window into language origins and evolutionary neuroscience. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020; 375(1789): 20190060. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nowicki S, Searcy WA, Hughes M, et al.: The evolution of bird song: male and female response to song innovation in swamp sparrows. Anim Behav. 2001; 62(6): 1189–1195.
    1. Brainard MS, Doupe AJ: Interruption of a basal ganglia-forebrain circuit prevents plasticity of learned vocalizations. Nature. 2000; 404(6779): 762–766. - PubMed
    1. Prather JF: Auditory signal processing in communication: perception and performance of vocal sounds. Hear Res. 2013; 305: 144–155. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources