Postoperative pain, recovery and discharge after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: A multicentre, single blinded, randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 38828497
- DOI: 10.1111/aas.14465
Postoperative pain, recovery and discharge after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: A multicentre, single blinded, randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Background: General anaesthesia is standard of care for patients undergoing robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). However, postoperative pain and bladder discomfort remains an issue, and optimising pain management could improve recovery and promote earlier home discharge. The main objective of this trial was to evaluate if patients receiving spinal anaesthesia are more frequently home ready at 8 pm on the same day compared with multimodal pain management following RALP under general anaesthesia.
Methods: This pragmatic, randomised controlled, multicentre trial was performed between January 2019 to December 2021. Patients undergoing RALP under general anaesthesia were randomised to either multimodal analgesia using parecoxib and morphine intra-operatively (Group GM) or spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine and sufentanil (Group GS). The primary aim, home readiness, was assessed using a post-anaesthesia discharge scoring system.
Results: Of 202 patients analysed, 27% patients reached home readiness criteria after 12 h, 46% after 24 h and 79% after 48 h, without differences between the groups. Urge to pass urine was greater in group GM than in group GS (p ⟨0.001) and lasted for a median of two hours in both groups. More patients expressed satisfaction with postoperative care in group GS (p ⟨0.001). No other significant differences were found between the groups.
Discussion: We found no difference in time to home readiness between the groups. Approximately one-fourth of the patients achieved home readiness the same day after surgery without difference between the groups. Fewer patients had urge, and patient satisfaction was greater in group GS.
Keywords: laparoscopic prostatectomy; multimodal analgesia; spinal anaesthesia.
© 2024 The Author(s). Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Nationellt vårdprogram prostatacancer [Internet]. Regionala cancercentrum i samverkan; 2022 June Report No. Accessed November 10, 2023. https://kunskapsbanken.cancercentrum.se/globalassets/cancerdiagnoser/pro...
-
- RATTEN – Interactive online report from NPCR [Internet]. National Prostate Cancer Register (NPCR) of Sweden; 2022 October. https://statistik.incanet.se/npcr/
-
- Wallerstedt A, Tyritzis SI, Thorsteinsdottir T, et al. Short‐term results after robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared to open radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2015;67(4):660‐670.
-
- Wu SY, Chang CL, Chen CI, Huang CC. Comparison of acute and chronic surgical complications following robot‐assisted, laparoscopic, and traditional open radical prostatectomy among men in Taiwan. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(8):e2120156. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.20156
-
- Mottram A. ‘Like a trip to McDonalds’: a grounded theory study of patient experiences of day surgery. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48(2):165‐174.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
