Belantamab Mafodotin, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma
- PMID: 38828933
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2405090
Belantamab Mafodotin, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma
Abstract
Background: Belantamab mafodotin had single-agent activity in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, a finding that supports further evaluation of the agent in combination with standard-care therapies.
Methods: In this phase 3, open-label, randomized trial, we evaluated belantamab mafodotin, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (BVd), as compared with daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DVd), in patients who had progression of multiple myeloma after at least one line of therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Key secondary end points were overall survival, response duration, and minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status.
Results: In total, 494 patients were randomly assigned to receive BVd (243 patients) or DVd (251 patients). At a median follow-up of 28.2 months (range, 0.1 to 40.0), median progression-free survival was 36.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.4 to not reached) in the BVd group and 13.4 months (95% CI, 11.1 to 17.5) in the DVd group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.53; P<0.001). Overall survival at 18 months was 84% in the BVd group and 73% in the DVd group. An analysis of the restricted mean response duration favored BVd over DVd (P<0.001). A complete response or better plus MRD-negative status occurred in 25% of the patients in the BVd group and 10% of those in the DVd group. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 95% of the patients in the BVd group and 78% of those in the DVd group. Ocular events were more common in the BVd group than in the DVd group (79% vs. 29%); such events were managed with dose modifications, and events of worsening visual acuity mostly resolved.
Conclusions: As compared with DVd therapy, BVd therapy conferred a significant benefit with respect to progression-free survival among patients who had relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma after at least one line of therapy. Most patients had grade 3 or higher adverse events. (Funded by GSK; DREAMM-7 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04246047; EudraCT number, 2018-003993-29.).
Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Comment in
-
Belantamab Mafodotin, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.N Engl J Med. 2024 Oct 10;391(14):1364. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2410841. N Engl J Med. 2024. PMID: 39383465 No abstract available.
-
Belantamab Mafodotin, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma. Reply.N Engl J Med. 2024 Oct 10;391(14):1364-1365. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2410841. N Engl J Med. 2024. PMID: 39383466 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Belantamab mafodotin plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (DREAMM-7): updated overall survival analysis from a global, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2025 Aug;26(8):1067-1080. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00330-4. Epub 2025 Jul 15. Lancet Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40680754 Clinical Trial.
-
Patient-reported outcomes with belantamab mafodotin, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (DREAMM-7): results from a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial.Lancet Haematol. 2025 Aug;12(8):e599-e610. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(25)00163-2. Epub 2025 Jul 15. Lancet Haematol. 2025. PMID: 40680752 Clinical Trial.
-
Isatuximab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.N Engl J Med. 2024 Oct 31;391(17):1597-1609. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2400712. Epub 2024 Jun 3. N Engl J Med. 2024. PMID: 38832972 Clinical Trial.
-
Treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the bortezomib and lenalidomide era: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Ann Hematol. 2021 Mar;100(3):725-734. doi: 10.1007/s00277-021-04404-3. Epub 2021 Jan 11. Ann Hematol. 2021. PMID: 33432438
-
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450. Health Technol Assess. 2007. PMID: 17999840
Cited by
-
Current State of Evidence on Definitions and Management of High-Risk Multiple Myeloma.Curr Oncol Rep. 2025 Mar;27(3):258-277. doi: 10.1007/s11912-025-01639-5. Epub 2025 Feb 12. Curr Oncol Rep. 2025. PMID: 39937351 Review.
-
Relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: standard of care management of patients in the Gulf region.Clin Hematol Int. 2025 May 8;7(2):20-33. doi: 10.46989/001c.137860. eCollection 2025. Clin Hematol Int. 2025. PMID: 40352314 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluating Minimal Residual Disease Negativity as a Surrogate Endpoint for Treatment Efficacy in Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Am J Hematol. 2025 Mar;100(3):427-438. doi: 10.1002/ajh.27582. Epub 2025 Jan 9. Am J Hematol. 2025. PMID: 39784302 Free PMC article.
-
Multiple Myeloma Unpacked.Hematol Oncol. 2025 Jun;43 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e70067. doi: 10.1002/hon.70067. Hematol Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40517540 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A new era in myeloma: the advent of chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) cells and bispecific antibodies.Intern Med J. 2025 May;55(5):714-721. doi: 10.1111/imj.16647. Epub 2025 Feb 24. Intern Med J. 2025. PMID: 39989341 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials