Second-dose intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase in alteplase-resistant medium-vessel-occlusion strokes: A retrospective and comparative study
- PMID: 38829011
- PMCID: PMC11569577
- DOI: 10.1177/23969873241254936
Second-dose intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase in alteplase-resistant medium-vessel-occlusion strokes: A retrospective and comparative study
Abstract
Introduction: In intracranial medium-vessel occlusions (MeVOs), intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) shows inconsistent effectiveness and endovascular interventions remains unproven. We evaluated a new therapeutic strategy based on a second IVT using tenecteplase for MeVOs without early recanalization post-alteplase.
Patients and methods: This retrospective, comparative study included consecutively low bleeding risk MeVO patients treated with alteplase 0.9 mg/kg at two stroke centers. One center used a conventional single-IVT approach; the other applied a dual-IVT strategy, incorporating a 1-h post-alteplase MRI and additional tenecteplase, 0.25 mg/kg, if occlusion persisted. Primary outcomes were 24-h successful recanalization for efficacy and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) for safety. Secondary outcomes included 3-month excellent outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1). Comparisons were conducted in the overall cohort and a propensity score-matched subgroup.
Results: Among 146 patients in the dual-IVT group, 103 failed to achieve recanalization at 1 h and of these 96 met all eligible criteria and received additional tenecteplase. Successful recanalization at 24 h was higher in the 146 dual-IVT cohort patients than in the 148 single-IVT cohort patients (84% vs 61%, p < 0.0001), with similar sICH rate (3 vs 2, p = 0.68). Dual-IVT strategy was an independent predictor of 24-h successful recanalization (OR, 2.7 [95% CI, 1.52-4.88]; p < 0.001). Dual-IVT cohort patients achieved higher rates of excellent outcome (69% vs 44%, p < 0.0001). Propensity score matching analyses supported all these associations.
Conclusion: In this retrospective study, a dual-IVT strategy in selected MeVO patients was associated with higher odds of 24-h recanalization, with no safety concerns. However, potential center-level confounding and biases seriously limit these findings' interpretation.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05809921.
Keywords: Acute stroke; medium-vessel occlusion; tenecteplase; thrombolysis.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: I.S reports consultant fees for Bayer, BMS/Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim outside the submitted work, Medtronic, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Bioprojet, Astra-Zeneca, Alexion and speaker activities for AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS/Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medtronic, Novartis, Novo Nordisk; DS reports consultant fees for BMS/Pfizer, Boehringer-Ingelheim outside the submitted work, Novartis and speaker activities for BMS/Pfizer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, Servier, Sanofi; Other authors do not report any conflicting interests.
Figures



References
-
- Goyal M, Ospel JM, Menon BK, et al.. MeVO: the next frontier? J Neurointerv Surg 2020; 12: 545–547. - PubMed
-
- Ospel JM, Menon BK, Demchuk AM, et al.. Clinical course of acute ischemic stroke due to medium vessel occlusion with and without intravenous alteplase treatment. Stroke 2020; 51: 3232–3240. - PubMed
-
- Saver JL, Chapot R, Agid R, et al.. Thrombectomy for distal, medium vessel occlusions: a consensus statement on present knowledge and promising directions. Stroke 2020; 51: 2872–2884. - PubMed
-
- Logallo N, Kvistad CE, Thomassen L. Therapeutic potential of tenecteplase in the management of acute ischemic stroke. CNS Drugs 2015; 29: 811–818. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources