Centering relationships to place for more meaningful research and engagement
- PMID: 38830112
- PMCID: PMC11194485
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2306991121
Centering relationships to place for more meaningful research and engagement
Abstract
Research has the potential to simultaneously generate new knowledge and contribute meaningful social-ecological benefits; however, research processes and outcomes can also perpetuate extractive patterns that have manifested the climate, biodiversity, and social justice crises. One approach to enhance the societal value of research processes is to strengthen relationships with places of study and the peoples of those places. Deepening relational engagement with the social-ecological context and history of a place can lead to more accurate results and improved public trust in the scientific process and is particularly important for natural scientists who work at the interface of nature and society. We provide three actionable pathways that range from individual to systemic change to enhance place-based relationships within research systems: 1) deepen reflection and communication about relationships with places and peoples; 2) strengthen collaboration among research teams and partners; and 3) transform systems of knowledge creation to foster place-based roots. Action on any of these proposed pathways, but especially action taken across all three, can build empathy and connections to place and people, strengthening the meaningful impact of research both locally and globally.
Keywords: decolonize research; meaningful research outcomes; place-based relationships; relational research; transformation.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests statement:The authors declare no competing interest.
Figures
References
-
- Soga M., Gaston K. J., Halsey O., Shifting baseline syndrome: Causes, consequences, and implications. Front. Ecol. Environ. 16, 222–230 (2018).
-
- Estes J. A., Vermeij G. J., History’s legacy: Why future progress in ecology demands a view of the past. Ecology 103, e3788 (2022). - PubMed
-
- de Vos A., Schwartz M. W., Confronting parachute science in conservation. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 4, e12681 (2022).
-
- Oreskes N., “Why trust science?” in Why Trust Science? (Princeton University Press, 2021), 10.1515/9780691222370 (22 May 2023). - DOI
-
- Friel S., Arthur M., Frank N., Power and the planetary health equity crisis. The Lancet 400, 1085–1087 (2022). - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
