Evaluating associations of bisphenol and phthalate exposure with time to pregnancy and subfecundity in a New York City pregnancy cohort
- PMID: 38830524
- PMCID: PMC11321920
- DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124281
Evaluating associations of bisphenol and phthalate exposure with time to pregnancy and subfecundity in a New York City pregnancy cohort
Abstract
It is important to understand the impact of consumer chemical exposure and fecundity, a couple's measure of probability of successful conception, given approximately 15% of couples experience infertility. Prior research has generally found null associations between bisphenol and phthalate exposure and fecundability, measured via time to pregnancy (TTP). However, this research has not been updated with current chemical exposures and have often lacked diversity in their study populations. We evaluated the associations between common bisphenol and phthalate chemical exposure groups and TTP as well as subfecundity (TTP>12 months) in the New York University Children's Health Study, a diverse pregnancy cohort from 2016 onward. Using first-trimester spot-urine samples to measure chemical exposure and self-reported TTP from first-trimester questionnaires, we observed a significant adverse association between total bisphenol exposure and certain phthalate groups on TTP and odds of subfecundity. Furthermore, in a mixtures analysis to explore the joint effects of the chemical groups on the outcomes, we found evidence of a potential interaction between total bisphenol exposure and low-molecular weight phthalates on TTP. Future research should continue to update our knowledge regarding the complex and potentially interacting effects of these chemicals on reproductive health.
Keywords: Bisphenols; Consumer chemicals; Fecundability; Fertility; Phthalates; Subfecundity.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Mia Charifson reports financial support was provided by National Science Foundation. Mengling Liu reports financial support was provided by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Eunsil Seok reports financial support was provided by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Yuyan Wang reports financial support was provided by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Leonardo Trasande reports financial support was provided by National Institutes of HealthOffice of the Director. Linda Kahn reports financial support was provided by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures


References
-
- Thoma ME, McLain AC, Louis JF, King RB, Trumble AC, Sundaram R, Buck Louis GM. Prevalence of infertility in the United States as estimated by the current duration approach and a traditional constructed approach. Fertility and Sterility. 2013;99(5):1324-. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.037. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Chandra A, Copen CE, Stephen EH. Infertility service use in the United States: data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 1982–2010. National Health Statistics Report. 2014;73:1–21. - PubMed
-
- Stephen EH, Chandra A. Updated projections of infertility in the United States: 1995–2025. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources