Research with animals: requirement, responsibility, welfare
- PMID: 3883054
- DOI: 10.1258/002367785780890640
Research with animals: requirement, responsibility, welfare
Abstract
Recognition of unacceptable cruelty to animals in pasttimes such as bull-baiting, dates in Britain from the early 19th century. The Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals was founded in 1824. Several bills to curb cruelty were discussed in Parliament, and the Cruel and Improper Treatment of Cattle Act was passed in 1822. Other Acts have followed over the years. Cruelty in the form of painful scientific experiments, including dissection of living, conscious animals, vivisection, was proscribed by the Cruelty to Animals Act 1876. That Act required anyone wishing to experiment with animals to obtain a licence from the Secretary of State. Conditions for issue of licences were strict and remain so to this day. The Act is still valid, and is enforced by the Home Office, with its medical and veterinary Inspectors. The Cruelty to Animals Act 1876 allows experiments on animals under strictly controlled conditions. Experiments must have the clear objective of improving the welfare of man and/or animals. Benefits from experiments carried out under the Act have been enormous, covering every aspect of diagnosis, treatment, and prophylaxis in human and veterinary medicine. Coincidentally, the welfare of laboratory animals has also been greatly improved. There has always been some opposition to the use of animals in biomedical research. The subject is emotive but, by and large, discussion has been rational and within the law. In recent years, however, the morality of using experimental animals has been examined more closely. The possibility of replacing them by alternative methods has been investigated. Where these alternatives are applicable, they are used and further research on them continues. The questioning of animal experiments has emphasized the need to look constantly at animal welfare to ensure humane treatment of all animals, especially those restricted in a laboratory or on a farm. Attention has been drawn in this work to our existing laws protecting animals, but new legislation is being demanded, not only by some lay welfare groups but also by scientists. Hence, it has become very important to discuss various ways of ensuring animal welfare, including by legislation, especially with those knowledgeable in laboratory animal science and animal experiments.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Similar articles
-
Historical issues concerning animal experimentation in the United States.Soc Sci Med. 1981;15F:13-7. Soc Sci Med. 1981. PMID: 11655143
-
Animals in research.Lancet. 1985 May 25;1(8439):1230. Lancet. 1985. PMID: 11644485
-
Scientific procedures on living animals: proposals for reform of the 1876 Cruelty to Animals Act.Altern Lab Anim. 1985 Jun;12(4):225-42. Altern Lab Anim. 1985. PMID: 12085921 Review. No abstract available.
-
The Animals (scientific procedures) Act 1986.Lancet. 1986 Jul 5;2(8497):32-3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)92571-7. Lancet. 1986. PMID: 2873327
-
Assessing harm and justification in animal research: federal policy opens the laboratory door.Rutgers Law Rev. 1988 Spring;40(3):723-95. Rutgers Law Rev. 1988. PMID: 11650811 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Solving an ethical issue involved in experimentation with animals in a brazilian teaching laboratory*.Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2004 Nov;32(6):395-9. doi: 10.1002/bmb.2004.494032060404. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2004. PMID: 21706763 Free PMC article.
-
Brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome: much more than a surgical problem.Vet Q. 2022 Dec;42(1):213-223. doi: 10.1080/01652176.2022.2145621. Vet Q. 2022. PMID: 36342210 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Responsibility and Laboratory Animal Research Governance.Sci Technol Human Values. 2018 Jul;43(4):723-741. doi: 10.1177/0162243917727866. Epub 2017 Sep 1. Sci Technol Human Values. 2018. PMID: 30008495 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources