Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 18;96(24):9859-9865.
doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c00333. Epub 2024 Jun 3.

Accelerated Screening of Protein-Ligand Interactions via Parallel T2-Weighted 19F-MRI

Affiliations

Accelerated Screening of Protein-Ligand Interactions via Parallel T2-Weighted 19F-MRI

Dilara Faderl et al. Anal Chem. .

Abstract

In drug discovery, ligands are sought that modulate the (mal-)function of medicinally relevant target proteins. In order to develop new drugs, typically a multitude of potential ligands are initially screened for binding and subsequently characterized for their affinity. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is a well-established and highly sensitive technology for characterizing such interactions. However, it has limited throughput, because only one sample can be measured at a time. In contrast, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is inherently parallel and MR parameters can conveniently be encoded in its images, potentially offering increased sample throughput. We explore this application using a custom-built 9-fold sample holder and a 19F-MRI coil. With this setup, we show that ligand binding can be detected by T2-weighted 19F-MRI using 4-(trifluoromethyl)benzamidine (TFBA) and trypsin as the reporter ligand and target protein, respectively. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the affinity of nonfluorinated ligands can be determined in a competition format by monitoring the dose-dependent displacement of TFBA. By comparing 19F-T2-weighted MR images of TFBA in the presence of different benzamidine (BA) concentrations-all recorded in parallel-the affinity of BA could be derived. Therefore, this approach promises parallel characterization of protein-ligand interactions and increased throughput of biochemical assays, with potential for increased sensitivity when combined with hyperpolarization techniques.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Alderman–Grant coil designed to operate at 612 MHz corresponding to the 19F NMR Larmor frequency at 15.2 T. A 3D-printed coil holder (black) and coaxial RF cable (blue) are also shown. The schematic insert above shows the geometry of the coil tracks. (b) S11 reflection curve of the unloaded Alderman–Grant resonator.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sample holder assembly, 3D-printed using PLA. Nine individual sample capillaries, each with an OD of 2.4 mm, and filled with a sample volume of 150–200 μL, were thus accommodated.
Figure 3
Figure 3
19F limit of detection of TFBA in a capillary system. Five different TFBA concentrations (white) and their calculated SNR (yellow) values are shown from the FLASH experiment in one acquisition experiment. The imaging parameters were as follows: FOV, 30 mm × 30 mm; MTX, 32 × 32; SL, 5 mm; TR/TE = 100/4 ms; NEX, 200; TA, 10 min, 40 s. SNR was calculated as described in the Experimental Methods section, taking a slice ROI area covering 3.55 voxels, with a volume of 4.4 mm3 per sample.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Transverse relaxation time dependence on binding between trypsin and its reporter and competitor ligands, TFBA and BA. Spin–echo intensities extracted from the chosen ROI of the MR-image averaged 20 scans, of 25 mM TFBA obtained in the absence (black) and presence of 150 μM trypsin (blue), and in the presence of both 150 μM trypsin and 10 mM benzamidine (red). T2 relaxation times were obtained by fitting the mean of three replicate measurements to a single exponential (error bars are ± standard deviation); T2,f = 952 ms, T2,nc = 231 ms, and T2,c = 738 ms, (ParaVision) with a fit quality (R2) of 0.98, 0.98, and 0.97 (originLab), respectively. The corresponding relaxation rates are R2,f = 1.05 s–1, R2,nc = 4.33 s–1, and R2,c = 1.36 s–1.
Figure 5
Figure 5
19F T2 map of TFBA obtained using MSME. Samples for noncompetitive binding to trypsin and competitive binding in the presence of BA were measured in a single experiment. The MSME experiment was a collection of nine samples with 10 echo times, ranging from 200 ms to 1100 ms. Fixed amounts of TFBA (A, 25 mM) were added to trypsin in different concentrations (B, 25 μM; C, 50 μM; D, 75 μM; and E, 150 μM) for noncompetitive experiments. Different concentrations of BA (F, 1 mM; G, 10 mM; H, 25 mM; and I, 50 mM) was then added to the fixed TFBA and trypsin at 150 μM for the competition format. The imaging parameters were as follows: FOV, 20 mm × 20 mm; MTX, 32 × 32; SL, 10 mm; TR/TE = 5418/100 ms; NEX, 20. The full set of 10 echo experiments required 76 min. The image displayed was obtained at an echo time of 200 ms. The crosslike shapes are due to a partial volume effect resulting from pixel dimensions approaching the diameter of the sample capillary.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Dependence of the TFBA 19F signal intensity (black) and R2 rates (red) on titrating trypsin ([TFBA] = 25 mM). 19F-signal intensities are normalized with the sample without trypsin.
Figure 7
Figure 7
TFBA 19F signal intensity (black) and R2 rates (red) in the competitive assay. BA was titrated with [TFBA] = 25 mM and [trypsin] = 150 μM. Lines connecting the data points are intended to guide the eye.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Macarron R.; Banks M. N.; Bojanic D.; Burns D. J.; Cirovic D. A.; Garyantes T.; Green D. V. S.; Hertzberg R. P.; Janzen W. P.; Paslay J. W.; Schopfer U.; Sittampalam G. S. Impact of high-throughput screening in biomedical research. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2011, 10, 188–195. 10.1038/nrd3368. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dalvit C.; Fagerness P. E.; Hadden D. T. A.; Sarver R. W.; Stockman B. J. Fluorine-NMR Experiments for High-Throughput Screening: Theoretical Aspects, Practical Considerations, and Range of Applicability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 7696–7703. 10.1021/ja034646d. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dove A. W. Drug screening-beyond the bottleneck. Nat. Biotechnol. 1999, 17, 859–863. 10.1038/12845. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gossert A. D.; Jahnke W. NMR in drug discovery: A practical guide to identification and validation of ligands interacting with biological macromolecules. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2016, 97, 82–125. 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2016.09.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ross A.; Schlotterbeck G.; Senn H.; von Kienlin M. Application of Chemical Shift Imaging for Simultaneous and Fast Acquisition of NMR Spectra on Multiple Samples. Angew. Chem. (Int. Ed. Engl.) 2001, 40, 3243–3245. 10.1002/1521-3773(20010903)40:17<3243::AID-ANIE3243>3.0.CO;2-F. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types