Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 3;24(1):1479.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18713-5.

Interventions to increase vaccination in vulnerable groups: rapid overview of reviews

Gill Norman  1   2   3 , Maartje Kletter  4 , Jo Dumville  4
Affiliations

Interventions to increase vaccination in vulnerable groups: rapid overview of reviews

Gill Norman et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Objective: Groups which are marginalised, disadvantaged or otherwise vulnerable have lower uptake of vaccinations. This differential has been amplified in COVID-19 vaccination compared to (e.g.) influenza vaccination. This overview assessed the effectiveness of interventions to increase vaccination in underserved, minority or vulnerable groups.

Methods: In November 2022 we searched four databases for systematic reviews that included RCTs evaluating any intervention to increase vaccination in underserved, minority or vulnerable groups; our primary outcome was vaccination. We used rapid review methods to screen, extract data and assess risk of bias in identified reviews. We undertook narrative synthesis using an approach modified from SWiM guidance. We categorised interventions as being high, medium or low intensity, and as targeting vaccine demand, access, or providers.

Results: We included 23 systematic reviews, including studies in high and low or middle income countries, focused on children, adolescents and adults. Groups were vulnerable based on socioeconomic status, minority ethnicity, migrant/refugee status, age, location or LGBTQ identity. Pregnancy/maternity sometimes intersected with vulnerabilities. Evidence supported interventions including: home visits to communicate/educate and to vaccinate, and facilitator visits to practices (high intensity); telephone calls to communicate/educate, remind/book appointments (medium intensity); letters, postcards or text messages to communicate/educate, remind/book appointments and reminder/recall interventions for practices (low intensity). Many studies used multiple interventions or components.

Conclusion: There was considerable evidence supporting the effectiveness of communication in person, by phone or in writing to increase vaccination. Both high and low intensity interventions targeting providers showed effectiveness. Limited evidence assessed additional clinics or targeted services for increasing access; only home visits had higher confidence evidence showing effectiveness. There was no evidence for interventions for some communities, such as religious minorities which may intersect with gaps in evidence for additional services. None of the evidence related to COVID-19 vaccination where inequalities of outcome are exacerbated.

Prospero registration: CRD42021293355.

Keywords: Inequity; Intervention; Minorities; Systematic review; Vaccination; Vulnerable groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram for records identified for the review
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Summary of ROBIS assessments for included reviews
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Summary of GROOVE assessment of overlapping RCTs in included review
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Butler R, McDonald NE. SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy. Diagnosing the determinants of vaccine hesitancy in specific subgroups: the Guide to Tailoring immunization programmes (TIP) Vaccine. 2015;14(33):4176–9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.038. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Watkinson RE, et al. Ethnic inequalities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake and comparison to seasonal influenza vaccine uptake in Greater Manchester, UK: a cohort study. PLoS Med. 2022;19(3):e1003932. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003932. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Disparities in the risk and outcomes of COVID-19. 2020, Public Health England: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa....
    1. Dubé E, Gagnon D, McDonald NE. Strategies intended to address vaccine hesitancy: review of published reviews. Vaccine. 2015;33:4191–203. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.041. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Norman G, Kletter M, Dumville J. CRD42021293355. Rapid review of reviews of interventions for vaccine hesitancy in underserved, minority or vulnerable groups. 2021.

Publication types

Substances