Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 3;22(1):10.
doi: 10.1186/s12963-024-00330-4.

Country-specific determinants for COVID-19 case fatality rate and response strategies from a global perspective: an interpretable machine learning framework

Affiliations

Country-specific determinants for COVID-19 case fatality rate and response strategies from a global perspective: an interpretable machine learning framework

Cui Zhou et al. Popul Health Metr. .

Abstract

Background: There are significant geographic inequities in COVID-19 case fatality rates (CFRs), and comprehensive understanding its country-level determinants in a global perspective is necessary. This study aims to quantify the country-specific risk of COVID-19 CFR and propose tailored response strategies, including vaccination strategies, in 156 countries.

Methods: Cross-temporal and cross-country variations in COVID-19 CFR was identified using extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) including 35 factors from seven dimensions in 156 countries from 28 January, 2020 to 31 January, 2022. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to further clarify the clustering of countries by the key factors driving CFR and the effect of concurrent risk factors for each country. Increases in vaccination rates was simulated to illustrate the reduction of CFR in different classes of countries.

Findings: Overall COVID-19 CFRs varied across countries from 28 Jan 2020 to 31 Jan 31 2022, ranging from 68 to 6373 per 100,000 population. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the determinants of CFRs first changed from health conditions to universal health coverage, and then to a multifactorial mixed effect dominated by vaccination. In the Omicron period, countries were divided into five classes according to risk determinants. Low vaccination-driven class (70 countries) mainly distributed in sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America, and include the majority of low-income countries (95.7%) with many concurrent risk factors. Aging-driven class (26 countries) mainly distributed in high-income European countries. High disease burden-driven class (32 countries) mainly distributed in Asia and North America. Low GDP-driven class (14 countries) are scattered across continents. Simulating a 5% increase in vaccination rate resulted in CFR reductions of 31.2% and 15.0% for the low vaccination-driven class and the high disease burden-driven class, respectively, with greater CFR reductions for countries with high overall risk (SHAP value > 0.1), but only 3.1% for the ageing-driven class.

Conclusions: Evidence from this study suggests that geographic inequities in COVID-19 CFR is jointly determined by key and concurrent risks, and achieving a decreasing COVID-19 CFR requires more than increasing vaccination coverage, but rather targeted intervention strategies based on country-specific risks.

Keywords: COVID-19; Case fatality rate; Global health; Pandemics; SHAP; Strategy; Vaccination; XGBoost.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Trends in and distributions of CFR. a Epidemiological curves of COVID-19 CFR by WHO region from 28 January 2020 to 31 January 2022. b Global distribution of CFR in the original, Alpha, Delta, and Omicron periods
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The importance of each factor affecting CFR and its effects in the original, Alpha, Delta, and Omicron periods. a ISs for each feature affecting CFR in each period model, obtained by taking the absolute mean of the SHAP values. The 35 features represent seven distinct dimensions: vaccination coverage, demographic factors, disease burden, behavioural risk factors, environmental risk factors, health services, and trust levels. b SHAP dependence plots for proportion of population aged over 65, booster vaccination rate, CVD, and GDP per capita in the XGBoost models. SHAP values above zero represent an increased risk of higher COVID-19 CFR. Abbreviations: IS, important score; LRI, lower respiratory infections; URI, upper respiratory infections; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CVD, cardiovascular diseases; CKD, chronic kidney disease; HTN, hypertension; MD, mental disorders; NCD, noncommunicable diseases; HIV, HIV infection; TB, tuberculosis
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Country classification according to the most important risk factors and concurrent risks influencing COVID-19 CFR. a Grouping of countries into five classes based on the most important risk factors in the Omicron model. Class 1: low vaccine coverage; Class 2: ageing; Class 3: high disease burden; Class 4: low GDP; Class 5: other. b Percentage of countries with certain concurrent risks in each class of countries
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Overall risk and contributions of main risk factors to the CFR for each country in Classes 1-4. Country abbreviations use the ISO 3166 ALPHA-3 codes [44]
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Distribution of and cross-class differences in the change in CFR after a simulated 5% increase in vaccination. a Global distribution of the predicted change in CFR after a 5% increase in vaccination coverage. b Scatter plot showing the change in CFR following increased vaccination versus current booster vaccination rate for each country. The box plot shows the distribution of change in CFR for each cluster, with boxes indicating the median and 25th and 75th percentiles

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahmed F, Ahmed N, Pissarides C, Stiglitz J. Why inequality could spread COVID-19. The Lancet Public Health. 2020;5:e240. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30085-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bambra C, Riordan R, Ford J, Matthews F. The COVID-19 pandemic and health inequalities. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020;74:964–968. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-214401. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO: COVID is here ‘for the foreseeable future | United Nations in Turkey [Internet]. [cited 2022 May 15]. Available from: https://turkey.un.org/en/169490-who-covid-here-foreseeable-future, https://turkey.un.org/en/169490-who-covid-here-foreseeable-future
    1. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jun 8]. Available from: https://covid19.who.int
    1. Moore S, Hill EM, Tildesley MJ, Dyson L, Keeling MJ. Vaccination and non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19: a mathematical modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21:793–802. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00143-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances