Implementation of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy in routine antenatal care: A mixed-methods evaluation in three London NHS Trusts
- PMID: 38832251
- PMCID: PMC11145722
- DOI: 10.18332/ejm/188118
Implementation of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy in routine antenatal care: A mixed-methods evaluation in three London NHS Trusts
Abstract
Introduction: Unplanned pregnancies are associated with increased risks. Despite this, they are currently not routinely detected during antenatal care. This study evaluates the implementation of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy (LMUP) - a validated measure of pregnancy planning - into antenatal care at University College London Hospital, Homerton Hospital, and St Thomas' Hospital, England, 2019-2023.
Methods: We conducted a mixed methods evaluation of the pilot. Uptake and acceptability were measured using anonymized data with non-completion of the LMUP as a proxy measure of acceptability overall. We conducted focus groups with midwives, and one-to-one interviews with women, to explore their thoughts of asking, or being asked the LMUP, which we analyzed with a Framework Analysis.
Results: Asking the LMUP at antenatal appointments is feasible and acceptable to women and midwives, and the LMUP performed as expected. Advantages of asking the LMUP, highlighted by participants, include providing additional support and personalizing care. Midwives' concerns about judgment were unsubstantiated; women with unplanned pregnancies valued such discussions.
Conclusions: These findings support the implementation of the LMUP in routine antenatal care and show how it can provide valuable insights into the circumstances of women's pregnancies. This can be used to help midwives personalize care, and potentially reduce adverse outcomes and subsequent unplanned pregnancy. Integration of the LMUP into the Maternity Services Data Set will establish national data collection of a validated measure of unplanned pregnancy and enable analysis of the prevalence, factors, and implications of unplanned pregnancies across subpopulations and over time to inform implementation.
Keywords: London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy; evaluation; implementation; surveillance; unplanned pregnancy.
© 2024 Hall J.A. et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have each completed and submitted an ICMJE form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. The authors declare that they have no competing interests, financial or otherwise, related to the current work. J. Hall and C. Stewart report that Dama Health made payments to their institution for research consultancy relating to contraception research. H. Duncan reports that she has a leadership/fiduciary role in the coalition of academic experts and public health professionals of the UK Preconception Partnership and in the Ministerial taskforce for supporting with evidence and data from a civil service perspective of the Maternity Disparities Taskforce. She also reports substantive employment in The Office for Health Improvement and Disparities at the Department of Health and Social Care. J. Hall reports that travel and accommodation costs to attend an Annual Scientific Meeting in June 2023, were covered by the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Health; the NIHR Advanced Fellowship funds her salary and this research; she participates in the Data Safety Monitoring Board of ALERT; and she is a member without payment of the NHS England Maternity Transformation Programme, Public Health and Prevention Advisory Group and the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Health Research Group. H. Lovell reports that she has received a personal research development award from the NIHR Doctoral Clinical Academic Research Fellowship (Grant number 302860).
Figures
Similar articles
-
Introduction of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy at the booking visit and the midwives' perspective.BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2023 Apr;49(2):112-117. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2022-201576. Epub 2022 Nov 21. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2023. PMID: 36410764
-
Evaluation of the Amharic version of the London measure of unplanned pregnancy in Ethiopia.PLoS One. 2022 Jun 13;17(6):e0269781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269781. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35696385 Free PMC article.
-
Using a validated instrument to assess pregnancy planning and preconception care at antenatal booking visits: a retrospective cohort study.Med J Aust. 2023 Oct 16;219(8):366-370. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52109. Epub 2023 Sep 24. Med J Aust. 2023. PMID: 37743071
-
Youth violence intervention programme for vulnerable young people attending emergency departments in London: a rapid evaluation.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(10):1-122. doi: 10.3310/JWKT0492. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023. PMID: 37470144
-
"Now, with a bit more knowledge, I understand why I'm asking those questions." midwives' perspectives on their role in the Greater Manchester health and social care partnership's programme to reduce alcohol exposed pregnancies.Midwifery. 2022 Jul;110:103335. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103335. Epub 2022 Apr 4. Midwifery. 2022. PMID: 35427883 Review.
Cited by
-
What Does 'Preconception Health' Mean to People? A Public Consultation on Awareness and Use of Language.Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14181. doi: 10.1111/hex.14181. Health Expect. 2024. PMID: 39180340 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Knight M, Bunch K, Patel R, et al. . Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care: Core report: Lessons learned to inform maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2018-20. Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership and National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford; 2022. Accessed April 25, 2024. https://hubble-live-assets.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/birth-companions/f...
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources