Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 3:8.
doi: 10.18332/ejm/188118. eCollection 2024.

Implementation of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy in routine antenatal care: A mixed-methods evaluation in three London NHS Trusts

Affiliations

Implementation of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy in routine antenatal care: A mixed-methods evaluation in three London NHS Trusts

Jennifer A Hall et al. Eur J Midwifery. .

Abstract

Introduction: Unplanned pregnancies are associated with increased risks. Despite this, they are currently not routinely detected during antenatal care. This study evaluates the implementation of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy (LMUP) - a validated measure of pregnancy planning - into antenatal care at University College London Hospital, Homerton Hospital, and St Thomas' Hospital, England, 2019-2023.

Methods: We conducted a mixed methods evaluation of the pilot. Uptake and acceptability were measured using anonymized data with non-completion of the LMUP as a proxy measure of acceptability overall. We conducted focus groups with midwives, and one-to-one interviews with women, to explore their thoughts of asking, or being asked the LMUP, which we analyzed with a Framework Analysis.

Results: Asking the LMUP at antenatal appointments is feasible and acceptable to women and midwives, and the LMUP performed as expected. Advantages of asking the LMUP, highlighted by participants, include providing additional support and personalizing care. Midwives' concerns about judgment were unsubstantiated; women with unplanned pregnancies valued such discussions.

Conclusions: These findings support the implementation of the LMUP in routine antenatal care and show how it can provide valuable insights into the circumstances of women's pregnancies. This can be used to help midwives personalize care, and potentially reduce adverse outcomes and subsequent unplanned pregnancy. Integration of the LMUP into the Maternity Services Data Set will establish national data collection of a validated measure of unplanned pregnancy and enable analysis of the prevalence, factors, and implications of unplanned pregnancies across subpopulations and over time to inform implementation.

Keywords: London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy; evaluation; implementation; surveillance; unplanned pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have each completed and submitted an ICMJE form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. The authors declare that they have no competing interests, financial or otherwise, related to the current work. J. Hall and C. Stewart report that Dama Health made payments to their institution for research consultancy relating to contraception research. H. Duncan reports that she has a leadership/fiduciary role in the coalition of academic experts and public health professionals of the UK Preconception Partnership and in the Ministerial taskforce for supporting with evidence and data from a civil service perspective of the Maternity Disparities Taskforce. She also reports substantive employment in The Office for Health Improvement and Disparities at the Department of Health and Social Care. J. Hall reports that travel and accommodation costs to attend an Annual Scientific Meeting in June 2023, were covered by the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Health; the NIHR Advanced Fellowship funds her salary and this research; she participates in the Data Safety Monitoring Board of ALERT; and she is a member without payment of the NHS England Maternity Transformation Programme, Public Health and Prevention Advisory Group and the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Health Research Group. H. Lovell reports that she has received a personal research development award from the NIHR Doctoral Clinical Academic Research Fellowship (Grant number 302860).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Themes and sub-themes identified within the overall framework of individual, organizational and external factors, from pregnant women and midwives interviewed in 2022 at University College London Hospital and Homerton Hospital, and in 2023 in St Thomas’ Hospital

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Starrs AM, Ezeh AC, Barker G, et al. . Accelerate progress-sexual and reproductive health and rights for all: report of the Guttmacher-Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2018;391(10140):2642-2692. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30293-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hall JA, Benton L, Copas A, Stephenson J. Pregnancy Intention and Pregnancy Outcome: Ssystematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Matern Child Health J. 2017;21(3):670-704. doi:10.1007/s10995-016-2237-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nelson HD, Darney BG, Ahrens K, et al. . Associations of Unintended Pregnancy With Maternal and Infant Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2022;328(17):1714-1729. doi:10.1001/jama.2022.19097 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shah PS, Balkihair T, Ohlsson A, Beyene J, Scott F, Frick C. Intention to become pregnant and low birth weight and preterm birth: a systematic review. Matern Child Health J. 2011;15(2):205-216. doi:10.1007/s10995-009-0546-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Knight M, Bunch K, Patel R, et al. . Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care: Core report: Lessons learned to inform maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2018-20. Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership and National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford; 2022. Accessed April 25, 2024. https://hubble-live-assets.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/birth-companions/f...

LinkOut - more resources