Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Jun 1;119(6):1056-1065.
doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002826. Epub 2024 Apr 8.

Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Gastrointestinal Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Gilmara Coelho Meine  1   2 , Rafael Veiga Picon  1 , Paula Arruda Espírito Santo  3 , Guilherme Becker Sander  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Gastrointestinal Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Gilmara Coelho Meine et al. Am J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Ultra-processed food (UPF) intake has been associated with a higher risk of obesity, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases. The initial data on the relationship between UPF consumption and cancer risk were derived from retrospective observational studies with conflicting results. This systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies aimed to investigate the association between UPF consumption and gastrointestinal cancer risk.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for prospective cohort studies that compared the highest vs the lowest level of UPF consumption according to NOVA food classification and reported the risk of gastrointestinal cancers by subsite. The association with cancer was quantified as hazard ratios (HR) using a random-effects model.

Results: Five prospective cohort studies were included in this review comprising 1,128,243 participants (241,201 participants in the highest and 223,366 in the lowest levels of UPF consumption). The mean follow-up ranged from 5.4 to 28 years. The highest UPF consumption was significantly associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (HR 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.21; P = 0.01; I2 = 31%), colon cancer (HR 1.12; 95% CI 1.02-1.23; P = 0.02; I2 = 0%), and non-cardia gastric cancer (HR 1.43; 95% CI 1.02-2.00; P = 0.04; I2 = 0%) compared with the lowest UPF intake. However, no association was found between high UPF consumption and hepatocellular, esophageal, pancreatic, gastric cardia, and rectal cancer.

Discussion: The highest level of UPF consumption was significantly associated with colorectal and non-cardia gastric cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Monteiro CA, Levy RB, Claro RM, et al. New classification of foods based on the extent and purpose of their processing. Cad Saúde Pública 2010;26(11):2039–49.
    1. Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Lawrence M, et al. Ultra-Processed Foods, Diet Quality, and Health Using the NOVA Classification System. FAO: Rome, Italy, 2019.
    1. Cediel G, Reyes M, Corvalán C, et al. Ultra-processed foods drive to unhealthy diets: Evidence from Chile. Public Health Nutr 2020;24(7):1698–707.
    1. Steele EM, Popkin BM, Swinburn B, et al. The share of ultra- processed foods and the overall nutritional quality of diets in the US: Evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study. Popul Health Metr 2017;15(1):6.
    1. Rauber F, da Costa Louzada ML, Steele EM, et al. Ultra-processed food consumption and chronic non-communicable diseases-related dietary nutrient profile in the UK (2008–2014). Nutrients 2018;10(5):587.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources